President of the United States of America H.E. Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.

Greetings 

The joint statement of the Fourth India-U.S. 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue on 11 April 2022 has unwarranted and uncalled for reference of Pakistan, which absolutely absurdly mentions Pakistan in an utterly wrong and highly improper and an undiplomatic manner about the 26/11 Mumbai and Pathankot attacks; as if these false flag ops were not arranged by India and that Pakistan was behind such acts. Actually, it is the Indian government which has been in the past and still sponsoringterrorism in Pakistan and also shamelessly and openly admitted by Indian NSA Ajit Doval whose videos are available on the google. Link: -https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2d7pb7

Further proof of Indian sponsorship of terrorism is also proved with admissions of killings and sabotage in Pakistan by Indian serving Navy commander Kulbhushan Yadev who was clandestinely sent in Pakistan for terrorism with changed Muslim name (Mubarak Hussain Patel) and fake passport issued officially by India, which India even could not deny at the ICJ’s hearings at Hague.

Regarding, 26/11 fake Mumbai attack, your honour may peruse the excerpts of a book published in India and written by aGerman national, which proves with irrefutable facts that it was managed by India to defame Pakistan, detailed as below:

‘The Betrayal of India’: German author accuses India of carrying out pre-planned Mumbai attacks

Elias Davidsson, the German author writes that the 2008 Mumbai attacks were pre-planned and executed by India itself while the United States and Israel were also complicit in conceiving, planning, directing and executing the attacks, claimed the German author challenging the official Indian accounts into the events in which 162 people were killed and over 300 others got injured in a 60-hour long operation.

In his book “The Betrayal of India: Revisiting the 26/11 Evidence,” Elias Davidsson, a German author has made startling revelations and claimed that alongside India, the US and possibly Israel were also complicit in conceiving, planning, directing and executing the attacks.

In the introduction of his book, Davidsson has mentioned that a cursory examination of the news reports regarding the Mumbai events reveals immediately four major reasons for subjecting the official account to an exacting scrutiny:

(i) It is puzzling that it took 1,000 police officers, security forces personnel and trained commandos more than 60 hours to subdue ten gunmen scattered over several locations.

(ii) The Indian authorities, including India’s prime minister, immediately blamed Pakistani entities for the attacks, i.e., before any investigation had even started.

(iii) No organization is known to have claimed responsibility for the complex operation conducted in Mumbai.

(iv) The political class of the United States showed immediate and inordinate interest in the events, although they were occurring 8,000 miles away and were not directed at Americans or at an American target.

The above excerpts of the book published by Pharos Media and Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, is critical evaluation of the official narrative of 26/11, as reflected in court documents and news reports in India.

Your Excellency, about the Pathankot attack you and the American government were very deceitfully misled about this yet another false flag operation by the Indian government for which you must demand an apology from Mr. Modi after you have read the following article written by an Indian writer Rohan Venkata Ramakrishnan and published in India on 4 January 2016 reproduced below, for your personal information that how the Indians not only be fooled your Honour, but the entire State Department of US government, which is an insult to the great American nation, as well.

Pathankot terror attack: Eight crucial unanswered questions from honey traps to a confusing Punjab Police story to the role of Ajit Doval, almost everything about this incident is murky.

Rohan Venkata Ramakrishnan Jan 04, 2016 · 09:15 The authorities have said that Pathankot terror attack, which was prematurely declared over on Saturday, and then on Sunday, has finally ended as of Monday afternoon. 

An official from the National Security Guard said that five terrorists who entered the air force base have been killed, after three days of operations which have left 11 security personnel dead and more injured. 

Although, initial reports suggested the attackers might have been members of the Jaish-e-Mohammad, the same terror outfit that was responsible for the 2001 attack on the Indian Parliament, another group called the United Jihad Council – actually a conglomerate of several terrorist organizations – has now claimed responsibility for it.

A National Security Guard official told the media that though the fifth terrorist had been killed, combing operations were still on to ensure that the base was secure. The official also said that all air force assets, including the personnel and their families were safe. 

Reportage on the issue has so far been relatively restrained, considering the operations were still ongoing for much of the last few days. In some cases the media has deliberately not put out information, having learnt from its follies during the 26/11 Mumbai attacks when some of the coverage was blamed for having spread panic and even assisted the terrorists. 

Despite this though, questions about the entire ordeal are starting to crop up and, once the dust has settled in Pathankot, authorities will have to take a long, hard look at the way India handles terror.

The Mumbai attacks comparison is instructive. That incident involved armed terrorists walking around highly populated areas in a big city and running into a police force that wasn’t trained to take on militants. The 26/11 attack would end up going on for four days.

This one took place at an air force base very close to the Pakistan border, which was already on high alert because of immediately actionable intelligence. The Pathankot attack has taken three whole days.

The coverage, mostly by reporters covering national security, has started to draw out exactly how many unanswered questions there are about the whole episode.

Unanswered questions

1. First there is the story about the Honey trap. An air force official had reportedly been conned into working as a “defenseanalyst” with a magazine in the United Kingdom, when in fact he was allegedly passing on information to intelligence agencies in Pakistan. Authorities have arrested the air force official and now intend to find out whether he also provided any information about the base in Pathankot. 

2. Then there is the thoroughly confusing story about a Punjab Superintendent of Police, Salwinder Singh, who says he was abducted by some of the terrorists while he was driving back from a religious shrine on Friday early morning, along with two others – his jeweler friend and cook. The abductors, he says, were five heavily armed terrorists in army fatigues.

According to the cook, Madan Gopal, they were overpowered by the terrorists and tied up in the back of the car. Gopal says they were eventually dumped by the terrorists, who drove away with Singh’s car, which had a blue beacon on top of it. 

Questions are being raised about what Singh – who had been transferred from Gurdaspur only recently because of sexual harassment complaints from five female constables – was doing out that late. Equally confusing is the decision of the heavily armed terrorists to simply dump Singh and the others, when they had reportedly earlier killed a taxi driver to use his car.

3. What follows is even more confusing. A note supposedly found in the car was what gave the media an initial idea that Jaish-e-Mohammad had been behind the attack. The note, which was circulated to the media as well, includes the words Jaish-e-Mohammad in English, and claims that the attack was done as retaliation for India’s decision to hang Afzal Guru, a convict in the Parliament attacks case.

4. Next there is the question of strange providence. Firstly, because the SP was let off, he was able to alert authorities about the terrorists being at large. Almost farcically, Punjab Police did not believe his story at first, in part because of his “colourful background”. Gopal, his cook, even claims that he was tortured by police, who kept asking him for the real story about what happened to the car.

Secondly, one of the terrorists is said to have used the SP’s phone to make phone calls, including one to his mother where he reportedly said that he was heading for martyrdom. This has apparently given authorities some evidence that they can now use to pin blame on elements in Pakistan, despite the Kashmir-based UJC taking credit for the attack. 

5. Next is the question about sending in the team of National Security Guard.

Once the Punjab Police came around to believing that the SP’s story was real, and that it was connected to terror, alarm bells were rung. Delhi was informed about the concerns, at which point National Security Advisor Ajit Doval reportedly swung into action.

According to Ajai Shukla, who covers national security for the Business Standard, Doval didn’t let the army run the operation and instead moved a team of the National Security Guard to the Pathankot base. This left security of the air base in the hands of the existing Defense Security Corps, mostly retired military veterans, the air force’s Garud commandos who lacked a specific operational brief, and the NSG. 

Intent on directly controlling what he anticipated would be a walk in the park, and without anticipating that there might be more than one group of terrorists, Mr. Doval led with his trump card – he ordered 150-160 National Security Guard (NSG) troopers to be flown down immediately from New Delhi. The army was placed on the side-lines….

It is revealing that not a single Pathankot casualty is from the army. The hapless DSC [Defense Security Corps] jawans took most of the casualties. The NSG took unacceptable losses, including an officer killed from a booby-trapped terrorist body. The army knows this ploy well and approaches terrorist bodies in J&K with caution, knowing the jihadi’s dying act could have been to activate a grenade and lie on it.” 

6. Manu Pubby’s story for the Economic Times suggested that a lack of a proper command-and-control system in place made the response haphazard. “Constant calls from the centre sent confusing messages and led to a lack of clarity over the status of the operation,” his story says, which is why the home minister and the defense minister tweeted about the success of the operation before it was actually over. 

7. Harinder Baweja in the Hindustan Times echoes the same concern, raising the main question: Despite advance intelligence, how did India allow terrorists into a base located so close to the border, take three whole days to neutralize the situation and lose 11 people in the process?

8. And Praveen Swami in the Indian Express points out issues with every element of the operation, which will need to be probed once the dust has settled, including the one about the lack of adequate security at the base.

Even though terrorists have successfully attacked several Pakistan Air Force bases in recent years, taking advantage of poor perimeter security, Pathankot had not installed electronic perimeter surveillance systems, further complicating the task of watching out for an intrusion. 

Then of course there are the broader questions of how the government responded in New Delhi, why it did not have clarity in its approach to briefing the media and what this now means for relations with Pakistan. Answering those questions will be hard if we’re not able to pin down just what has hit us in Pathankot in the first place.

Link: – https://amp.scroll.in/article/801374/pathankot-terror-attack-eight-crucial-unanswered-questions

Now, Your Excellency, let us have a cursory look of how Pakistan as the most trusted friend of the United States has served the cause of friendship with your great nation and also weigh its worth of services in USD terms to determineand calculate whether in the past almost 75 years who owes how much to whom?

In this regard, kindly peruse below the two messages dated 22 August 2017 (link:- https://www.snayyar.com/america-pakistan-a-saga-of-love-hate.html ) and 24 January 2016 (link:- https://www.snayyar.com/mr-president-obama.html ) to former Presidents Donald Trump and Barack Obama respectively.

America & Pakistan – A Saga of Love & Hate to Donald Trump

1. Which peace-loving country created

Al-Qaeda & ISIS? Was it Pakistan or America?

2. Which country (Pakistan or America) recently ferried ISIS to Tora Bora mountains on unmarked helicopters in Afghanistan? And what was the purpose of bringing ISIS terrorists, near to the Pakistani borders?

3. Why India & Afghanistan, right under the nose of the US government forces, are using Afghan territory, for un-leashing state sponsored terrorism in Pakistan, which was also confirmed by the former US Secretary of defense?

In this regard, Pakistan has already provided a dossier on Kulbhushan Yadev, giving details of the Indian state sponsored terrorism, which is an irrefutable proof of India’s state sponsored terrorist activities in Pakistan.

4. Why India is protesting against Pakistani efforts of constructing wall/fencing on Pak-Afghan borders, to stop terrorists being launched from Afghanistan into Pakistan? Are the Indians and Afghans afraid that with the building of wall/fencing, the excuse/propaganda that the terrorists are coming into Afghanistan from Pakistan’s territory, will no longer be tenable?

5. Why India is not protesting against Donald Trump’s plans of constructing wall along the border of Mexico?

6. Why and with which intentions US senators are meeting Indian sponsored terrorist, Altaf Hussain, in London, knowing fully well that he was the top fugitive of Pakistan, responsible for thousands of targeted killings and innumerable terror activities in Pakistan? Should Pakistan take these meetings as acts of friendship from the US, with which it has joined hands, for the last many decades, against fighting the Russian invasion of Afghanistan; and later on, in the WOT, which has so far caused loss of lives of over 60,000 Pakistanis killed, many more injured and cumulative financial losses of over a trillion dollars to its economy?

7. What will be the reaction of US government, if Pakistani law makers meet US’s enemy sponsored terrorists?

8. US must come clean and let the world and Pakistan, very clearly know, whether US is with Pakistan or with those terrorists and terror sponsoring countries, who are spreading terrorism, chaos and instability in Pakistan?

9. US must also tell the world, what it has done and is doing, to stop terrorists, launched by the Indian and Afghan governments, from Afghanistan into Pakistan?

10. US must also tell Pakistan, why it reneged from its promise with Pervaiz Musharraf’s government, in lieu of Pakistan’s total cooperation in WOT; that India will not have any role in Afghanistan’s war?

11. Does Donald Trump thinks that peace in south east Asia is possible, without resolving the Kashmir issue, according to the UN resolutions and wishes of the Kashmiris?

12. Why Donald Trump does not condemn state sponsored terrorism of Indian government, over the Kashmiris and why India is not censured and threatened with US sanctions, over its war crimes in Kashmir, genocide/lynching of Muslims in India (as a state policy to please hard liner Hindus and terrorist organization RSS), over cows’ issue; and grave human rights violations, against minorities and low caste Hindus, all over India?

13. Why Donald Trump is embracing Narendra Modi, whose hands are soaked with the blood/genocide/holocaust of thousands of Muslims, brutally killed in Gujarat, under his direct orders, which immediately resulted in ban on grant of US visa, to Narendra Modi?

14. Donald Trump and the US government must not forget that any aid it gave to Pakistan’s military, was not a favor, but to enable Pakistani military, to fight the US IMPOSED WOT.

15. Donald Trump should also not forget that the few billion dollars it paid to Pakistan for GLOC (ground lines of communications) was not a favor or charity, but were reimbursements.

16. Rather, it was Pakistan which gave to the US a big favors/charity of many more billions of dollars, by charging extremely low rates for the GLOC, as compared with the Russian States; and also don’t forget Pakistani huge charity to the US (about which Pakistan never mentioned unlike Donald Trump) for not charging a single penny, for the use of Pakistani air space. Hope the US government knows very well how much it paid to the Turkish government, for use of the Turkish air space, during Iraq war, for a very short time.

17. Hope the US government and Donald Trump knows how much it owes to Pakistan, for saving US troops from being lynched in Somalia?

18. Moreover, America cannot raise any objections over Pak – China close relations and the CPEC project, when China itself is the biggest partner of the USA in not only in trade, but loans, as well. What is good for gander is good for goose.

19. Last but not the least, for decades and decades, almost every American/world civil and military leader has appreciated Pakistan’s role and its unparalleled sacrifices, as a front-linestate during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and during the ongoing WOT, for the last over sixteen years.

20. In view of the foregoing, it is now for Donald Trump and his government to decide, once for all, whether the US is a friend or foe of Pakistan? But remember, from now onwards, the US can not be a foe of Pakistan, pretending to be its friend, as well.

Pakistan, America and President Barack Hussein Obama to Barack Obama

Dear Mr. President Barack Hussein Obama

Greetings

Media has reported on 24 January, 2016 a statement attributed to you, quoted as below:

Quote. “Pakistan can and must do more to dismantle terrorist networks” Unquote.

Sir, your priceless words of wisdom for your non-NATO ally, are very well appreciated and are on our head and eyes.

Hope, you will also appreciate that your non-NATO ally, which played it’s more than due part, in making your great country a sole super power, was ditched (after becoming the sole super power) by your country, to live and sort out with all those people or Hydras (Hydra story add a regeneration feature to the monster: for every head chopped off, the Hydra would regrow one or multiple heads), who were created, raised and armed by your country, (this fact is on record to have been openly admitted by Ms Hillary Clinton) to defeat the invading forces of the USSR in  Afghanistan.

Mr. President, you will also appreciate that in the 9/11 episode, no Pakistani was involved; and if your agencies had been vigilant enough in the first place, the twin towers and Pentagon, would never have been attacked.

Sir, you will also appreciate that your non-NATO ally, whole heartedly participated in your Afghanistan war, along with around 50 other countries.

However, it is a different story that Pakistan suffered more than 10 times more men and material losses (and still continues to suffer) than the combined losses of all the about 50 countries, which took part in your chosen Afghanistan war. And quite surprisingly, you still expect from us to do more.

On the the other side, no one from the West, even offered support to Pakistan, for righting-off of its foreign loans, or allowing without any preconditions, Pakistani products for sale, in their own markets.

Sir, during your Afghan war, you visited Afghanistan more than once.

However, you decided never to visit Pakistan, which was your so much staunch non-NATO ally that it didn’t even charge a single penny, from the USA, for use of Pakistani air space. Whereas, your country offered $20 billion to Turkey, for use of its airspace, during the Iraq war.

Sir, we the nation of Pakistan, are still fighting the full might of Hydra, which is not even sparing our school kids and young students, for being your non-NATO ally.

Although, most of the NATO countries have left Afghanistan yet, for Pakistan, the 15 years war against terror, is continuing unabatedly.

Sir, under the circumstances, how much prudent and appropriate it would have been for you, to repay the services of your most staunch friend (since, Korean war and CENTO/SEATO era), which was blown to smithereens, during your imposed Afghan war, by asking the Afghanistan’s government to DO MORE and to hand over to Pakistan, the terrorist master minds taking refuge in Afghanistan, where some US forces are still present.

Moreover, even more appropriate action from you, would have been to demand from India, to immediately stop acts of terrorism against your most friendly and ally country (whose soldier gave ultimate sacrifice to save the lives of American soldiers captured by the rebels in Somalian city of Mogadishu) through India’s old policy of sponsoring mercenaries to destabilize Pakistan; which doesn’t need any proof.

Because firstly, Indian PM Mr. Narendra Modi, himself, proudly admitted Indian role in the dismemberment of Pakistan; and secondly, its National Security Advisor Mr. Ajit Doval, openly confessed sponsoring TTP mercenaries in Pakistan, for defensive offensive operations.

Sir, just to refresh the memory, it is hoped that America will never forget the following acts of Pakistan, which no other country has done, as a friend of the United States:

Allowed U-2 planes to use our airspace and airport for flights over the USSR.

Allowed U-2 planes to use our airspace and airport in East Pakistan, for flights over China.

Pakistani efforts in bringing your country closer to China.

Pakistani security forces risked their lives to save the lives of Americans, in the burning US embassy in Islamabad.

Sir, we Pakistanis, who have put our survival and lives at stake, more than once, to honour the needs of friendship with your great country, are still looking forward, to warmly receive you and your family, as our most revered guests.

Best Regards,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Link:- Pakistan can and must do more to dismantle terrorist networks: Obama..http://tribune.com.pk/story/1033362/obama-urges-serious-action-against-extremists-in-pakistan/

Your Excellency, while concluding it can never be forgotten that how Pakistani government keeping with its tradition of peace and international cooperation opened its air and geographical space to ensure safe evacuation of thousands of European and American civilians from Afghanistan during the extremely precarious and sensitive days of August 2021 onwards.  

As far as the Indian government is concerned it absolutely wrongly maligned your government in their own sordid affairs with this false flag operation against America so that to hide their own grave human rights violations (which now has turned into a full-fledged GENOCIDE against Indian Muslims and Kashmiris as per the findings of Prof. Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch) and nuclear provocation of INTENTIONAL firing, as Indian inquiry has confirmed thatthere was no technical fault in the nuclear supersonicBrahMos cruise missile which landed 124 Km’s deep insidePakistan on 9 March 2022, wherein a nuclear holocaust was only averted because of the alertness and cool mindedness of the highly confident and responsible Pakistani civil and military leadership. 

In view of the foregoing, it is incumbent upon you as the President of the great super power of this planet, to come out clean and order your State Department to apologize to the government and people of Pakistan, for the wrong and incorrect mention of Pakistan, in the 11 April 2022 Indo-US meeting joint statement.

Kind Regards,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

+92 321 9402157

Lahore – Pakistan

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com

Reform Agenda for Pakistan

Huzaima Bukhari & Dr. Ikramul Haq

Pakistan needs all out fundamental structural reforms in all areasof governance and not in tax system alone (already elaborated in our book published by PIDE). The salient points for consideration of all political parties and national debate to evolve National Reforms Agenda, beyond party affiliations,before next elections can be: 1. Creating new province—South Punjab Province—for which constitutional amendment bill is already lying in National Assembly, filed on March 24, 2022.  2. Making Karachi federal territory to ensure that it gets due funds and best administration. 3. Carrying out fundamental reforms in the justice system and in administrative/governance apparatuses to eliminate the causes of litigation. Ensuring efficacy and accountability of all institutions.  4. Revamping of education system to end ignorance and illiteracy, and make people skilful rather than distributing paper degrees and diplomas. Focal point of education should be creating a society that is tolerant, disciplined, courteous and knowledgeable—capable of making innovations and technological advances.5. Holding direct elections of Senate and giving it powers to vote on Money Bill. 6. Decentralising political, administrative and financial responsibility to local governments. Education, health, housing, local policing, and all civil amenities should be provided through elected representatives of the local governments that should have powers to raise taxes for these purposes.7. Digitizing, enforcing transparency and accountability in the governments at all levels to enable citizens to understand and participating fully in the process of national integration. 8. Reforming civil services, ensuring fair deal for employees with effective and across the board accountability. 9. Eliminating terrorism, sectarianism, bigotry, intolerance and violence through enforcement of law and by taking concrete measures to ensure social development of society based on higher values of life and humanity.10. Implementing strict laws to curb terrorist financing, money laundering, plundering of national wealth, political write off of loans and leakages in revenue collections. 11. Devising long-term and short-term strategies to break the shackles of debt-trap, making Pakistan a self-reliant economy and ensuring social security and economic justice for all citizens.12. Reforming and strengthening of management of public finances. Transparent public sector spending coupled with efficient performance.13. Controlling wasteful, non-developmental expenditure.14. Reforming of technical, institutional and organizational dimensions of public finance.15. Ensuring good governance and corruption free administrative and judicial structures.16. Federal government should only collect income tax and customs duty. Harmonised sales tax on goods and services should be in the provincial domain. All federal, provincial and local taxes should be collected through one agency (National Tax Authority) which should also disburse pensions and other social security payments to all citizens.17. Reducing excessive marginal tax rates making them compatible with other tax jurisdictions of the world, especially in Asia.  Substantially reducing corporate rate of tax. Eliminating onerous taxes and other regulations for corporate sector that are main stumbling blocks for domestic and foreign investments. Simplifying tax laws and procedures.

Dr. Nadeem Ul Haque, Vice Chancellor of PIDE, in HowPakistan Became an Asian Tiger by 2050 has offered an optimistic, futuristic and realistic perspective for a prosperous Pakistan. Unfortunately, this work has yet not been given the attention it deserves by policymakers, legislators, academicians, businessmen and administrators. Our politicians, administrators, intelligentsia and entrepreneurs keep on complaining about multiple and complex challenges faced by Pakistan but seldom strive to implement even the available and workable solutions by local experts. We want IMF, World Bank and others to reform us. This is our real tragedy and dilemma. We must appreciate and implement the indigenous research-based solutions after debate in public and in national and provincial assemblies and Senate. The Standing and Special Committees should invite (through virtual platforms if needed) experts for assisting and there should be live telecast so that public learnsthe process of legislation for beneficial reforms.

______________________________________________________________________

Huzaima Bukhari & Dr. Ikramul Haq are  lawyers, Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), members Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellows of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). 

They can be contacted at: huzaima@huzaimaikram.com[mobile: +923008463310] and ikram@huzaimaikram.com[mobile: +9230084962025]

Respected Mian Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif Sahab.

AoA.

Sir,

Please accept profound felicitations to you, your family and combined opposition parties on your extremely hard earned almost certain election as Prime Minister of Pakistan by the National Assembly on Monday 11 April 2022 and for being the spearhead of the concerted efforts of the combined opposition parties of Pakistan to get rid of the previous government, which completely enslaved our motherland with the chains of the unimaginable harsh conditions for getting hardly $ 3 billion loans from the IMF.

By the Grace of Allah, it is hoped that with the sheer dint of your hard work, integrity, unwavering ability to relentlessly focus on an issue and unflinching commitment, you will also get miraculous success in the next most hard challenge of your life, of reinvigorating economy of Pakistan, virtually from the ashes.

Hope you know the secret of success of the arduous nation building task, which lies in the selection of the most competent right person for the right job, selected purely on merit, without any personal likes and dislikes.

However, kindly remember, no nation building task can succeed, without uniting a badly divided nation and the secret of uniting a nation lies in fairly dealing with all segments of society with justice.

Japan, China, France and Germany are the living examples of how countries, which were totally reduced to the stone age by the devastation of atomic bombs and the ravages of the world war II were rebuilt by their visionary leaders, using the magic of unity and inculcating discipline in the society.

In unity lies the strength and our huge manpower is our biggest asset.

Wishing you and your team the best of luck in your future endeavours to rebuild Pakistan, as per your personal commitment with the nation.

Kind Regards,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Prime Minister of Japan H.E. Mr. Kishida Fumio
Greetings 
The joint statement issued on 19 March 2022 after your visit to to India absolutely absurdly mentions Pakistan in an utterly wrong and highly improper and an undiplomatic manner about the  26/11 Mumbai and Pathankot attacks; as if these false flag ops were not arranged by India and that Pakistan was behind such acts. Actually, it is the Indian government which sponsors terrorism in Pakistan which has been openly admitted by its NSA Ajit Doval whose videos are available on the google.Link:- https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2d7pb7
Further proof of Indian sponsorship of terrorism is also proved with admissions of killings and sabotage in Pakistan by Indian serving Navy commander Kalbhushan Yadev who was clandestinely sent in Pakistan for terrorism with changed name (Mubarak Hussain Patel)  and fake passport issued officially by India, which India even could not deny at the ICJ’s hearings at Hague.
Regarding, 26/11 fake Mumbai attack your honour may peruse the excepts  of a book published in India and written by German national, which proves with irrefutable facts that it was again managed by India to defame Pakistan, detailed as below:
‘The Betrayal of India’: German author accuses India of carrying out pre-planned Mumbai attacks
The 2008 Mumbai attacks were pre-planned and executed by India itself while the United States and Israel were also complicit in conceiving, planning, directing and executing the attacks, claimed a German author challenging the official Indian accounts into the events in which 162 people were killed and over 300 others got injured in a 60-hour long operation.
In his book “The Betrayal of India: Revisiting the 26/11 Evidence,” Elias Davidsson, a German author has made startling revelations and claimed that alongside India, the US and possibly Israel were also complicit in conceiving, planning, directing and executing the attacks.
In the introduction of his book, Dividsson has mentioned that a cursory examination of the news reports regarding the Mumbai events reveals immediately four major reasons for subjecting the official account to an exacting scrutiny:
(i) It is puzzling that it took 1,000 police officers, security forces personnel and trained commandos more than 60 hours to subdue ten gunmen scattered over several locations.
(ii) The Indian authorities, including India’s prime minister, immediately blamed Pakistani entities for the attacks, ie before any investigation had even started.
(iii) No organization is known to have claimed responsibility for the complex operation conducted in Mumbai.
(iv) The political class of the United States showed immediate and inordinate interest in the events, although they were occurring 8,000 miles away and were not directed at Americans or at an American target.
The above excerpts of the book published by Pharos Media and Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, is critical evaluation of the official narrative of 26/11, as reflected in court documents and news reports in India.

Sir, about the Pathankot attack you and the Japanese government was very deceitfully misled about this yet another false flag operation by the Indian government for which you must demand an apology from Mr. Modi after you have read the following article written by an Indian writer Rohan Venkataramakrishnan and published in India on 4 January 2016 reproduced below, for your personal information that how the Indians not only befooled your Honour, but the entire foreign ministry of Japan, which is a grave insult to the great Japanese nation, as well.
Pathankot terror attack: Eight crucial unanswered questionsFrom honey traps to a confusing Punjab Police story to the role of Ajit Doval, almost everything about this incident is murky.
Rohan VenkataramakrishnanJan 04, 2016 · 09:15 pmThe authorities have said that Pathankot terror attack, which was prematurely declared over on Saturday, and then on Sunday, has finally ended as of Monday afternoon. 
An official from the National Security Guard said that five terrorists who entered the air force base have been killed, after three days of operations which have left 11 security personnel dead and more injured. 
Although, initial reports suggested the attackers might have been members of the Jaish-e-Mohammad, the same terror outfit that was responsible for the 2001 attack on the Indian Parliament, another group called the United Jihad Council – actually a conglomerate of several terrorist organisations – has now claimed responsibility for it.
A National Security Guard official told the media that though the fifth terrorist had been killed, combing operations were still on to ensure that the base was secure. The official also said that all air force assets, including the personnel and their families were safe. 
Reportage on the issue has so far been relatively restrained, considering the operations were still ongoing for much of the last few days. In some cases the media has deliberately not put out information, having learnt from its follies during the 26/11 Mumbai attacks when some of the coverage was blamed for having spread panic and even assisted the terrorists. 
Despite this though, questions about the entire ordeal are starting to crop up and, once the dust has settled in Pathankot, authorities will have to take a long, hard look at the way India handles terror.
The Mumbai attacks comparison is instructive. That incident involved armed terrorists walking around highly populated areas in a big city and running into a police force that wasn’t trained to take on militants. The 26/11 attack would end up going on for four days.
This one took place at an air force base very close to the Pakistan border, which was already on high alert because of immediately actionable intelligence. The Pathankot attack has taken three whole days.
The coverage, mostly by reporters covering national security, has started to draw out exactly how many unanswered questions there are about the whole episode.
Unanswered questions
1. First there is the story about the Honey trap. An air force official had reportedly been conned into working as a “defence analyst” with a magazine in the United Kingdom, when in fact he was allegedly passing on information to intelligence agencies in Pakistan. Authorities have arrested the air force official and now intend to find outwhether he also provided any information about the base in Pathankot. 
2. Then there is the thoroughly confusing story about a Punjab Superintendent of Police, Salwinder Singh, who says he was abducted by some of the terrorists while he was driving back from a religious shrine on Friday early morning, along with two others – his jeweller friend and cook. The abductors, he says, were five heavily armed terrorists in army fatigues.
According to the cook, Madan Gopal, they were overpowered by the terrorists and tied up in the back of the car. Gopal says they were eventually dumped by the terrorists, who drove away with Singh’s car, which had a blue beacon on top of it. 
Questions are being raised about what Singh – who had been transferred from Gurdaspuronly recently because of sexual harassment complaints from five female constables – was doing out that late. Equally confusing is the decision of the heavily armed terrorists to simply dump Singh and the others, when they had reportedly earlier killed a taxi driver to use his car.
3. What follows is even more confusing. A note supposedly found in the car was what gave the media an initial idea that Jaish-e-Mohammad had been behind the attack. The note, which was circulated to the media as well, includes the words Jaish-e-Mohammad in English, and claims that the attack was done as retaliation for India’s decision to hang Afzal Guru, a convict in the Parliament attacks case.
4. Next there is the question of strange providence. Firstly, because the SP was let off, he was able to alert authorities about the terrorists being at large. Almost farcically, Punjab Police did not believe his story at first, in part because of his “colourful background”. Gopal, his cook, even claims that he was tortured by police, who kept asking him for the real story about what happened to the car.
Secondly, one of the terrorists is said to have used the SP’s phone to make phone calls, including one to his mother where he reportedly said that he was heading for martyrdom. This has apparently given authorities some evidence that they can now use to pin blame on elements in Pakistan, despite the Kashmir-based UJC taking credit for the attack. 
5. Next is the question about sending in the team of National Security Guard.
Once the Punjab Police came around to believing that the SP’s story was real, and that it was connected to terror, alarm bells were rung. Delhi was informed about the concerns, at which point National Security Advisor Ajit Doval reportedly swung into action.
According to Ajai Shukla, who covers national security for the Business Standard, Doval didn’t let the army run the operation and instead moved a team of the National Security Guard to the Pathankot base. This left security of the air base in the hands of the existing Defence Security Corps, mostly retired military veterans, the air force’s Garud commandos who lacked a specific operational brief, and the NSG. 
Intent on directly controlling what he anticipated would be a walk in the park, and without anticipating that there might be more than one group of terrorists, Mr Doval led with his trump card – he ordered 150-160 National Security Guard (NSG) troopers to be flown down immediately from New Delhi. The army was placed on the side-lines….
It is revealing that not a single Pathankot casualty is from the army. The hapless DSC [Defence Security Corps] jawans took most of the casualties. The NSG took unacceptable losses, including an officer killed from a booby-trapped terrorist body. The army knows this ploy well and approaches terrorist bodies in J&K with caution, knowing the jihadi’s dying act could have been to activate a grenade and lie on it.” 
6. Manu Pubby’s story for the Economic Timessuggested that a lack of a proper command-and-control system in place made the response haphazard. “Constant calls from the centre sent confusing messages and led to a lack of clarity over the status of the operation,” his story says, which is why the home minister and the defence minister tweeted about the success of the operation before it was actually over. 
7. Harinder Baweja in the Hindustan Timesechoes the same concern, raising the main question: Despite advance intelligence, how did India allow terrorists into a base located so close to the border, take three whole days to neutralise the situation and lose 11 people in the process?
8. And Praveen Swami in the Indian Express points out issues with every element of the operation, which will need to be probed once the dust has settled, including the one about the lack of adequate security at the base.
Even though terrorists have successfully attacked several Pakistan Air Force bases in recent years, taking advantage of poor perimeter security, Pathankot had not installed electronic perimeter surveillance systems, further complicating the task of watching out for an intrusion. 
Then of course there are the broader questions of how the government responded in New Delhi, why it did not have clarity in its approach to briefing the media and what this now means for relations with Pakistan. Answering those questions will be hard if we’re not able to pin down just what has hit us in Pathankot in the first place.
Link:- https://amp.scroll.in/article/801374/pathankot-terror-attack-eight-crucial-unanswered-questions
Concluding Sir, it must be remembered that the Indian government wrongly maligned you and your government in their own sordid affairs with this false flag operation against Japan so that to hide their own nuclear provocation of intentional firing on 9 March 2022 of a nuclear supersonic cruise missile deep 124 KM’s inside Pakistan wherein a nuclear holocaust was only averted because of the alertness and cool mindedness of the highly confident and responsible Pakistani civil and military leadership. In view of the foregoing, it is incumbent upon you as the Prime Minister of the great Japanese nation to come out clean and apologise to the government of Pakistan for the wrong and incorrect mention of Pakistan in the 16 March 2022 joint statement of Japan-India.
Kind Regards,
Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
+92 321 9402157
Lahore – Pakistan

Subject:- Involve 23 crore Pakistanis to fight the terrorism

The President of Pakistan
The Prime Minister of Pakistan
The Interior Minister of Pakistan
All Parliamentarians of Pakistan
Entire Leadership of Pakistan
All Pakistanis

اسلام و علیکم

[These proposals are being again submitted for the urgent consideration of the government’s law enforcing agencies, thinks tanks and the Pakistani society as a whole after heart wrenching suicide attack of 4 March 2022 taking the lives of over 60 worshippers in a Mosque of Peshawar that there must be more multidimensional concerted and meaningful efforts (besides increasing security) to the killings of Pakistanis by our enemies at will and like a sitting duck.]

Today on 1 December, 2017 another terrorist attack in Peshawar took the lives of 9 people, whereas, 30 persons got injured.

In this latest terrorist attack, it has been reported that three attackers wearing burqa, arrived at their target place in a rickshaw, which again proves beyond shadow of any doubt that the attackers spent much of their time, hiding in Peshawar, before the attack, in some nearby building.

In this regard, kind attention of all concerned is invited towards the following proposal of 26, November, 2010 to curb the menace of terrorism posted on www.snayyar.com at link:- https://www.snayyar.com/terrorism-a-proposal-to-curb-the-menace.html#sthash.1hRcSZ1D.dpbs
Terrorism – A proposal to Curb the Menace

The sudden increase of acts of terrorism with particular reference to the incidents in May 2011 & PIDC House attack on Nov. 11, 2010 in Karachi, highlights the importance of preventive measures to curb the menace of terrorism, which is causing severe losses to men, material, reputation and finances of the country.

In the cases of terrorist attacks on the GHQ, PIDC House & Pakistan Navy air base it was reported that the gang of attackers was residing in a rented house for quite some time, in an area not very far away from their targets. It was also reported that the neighbors of these houses were although, suspicious of these tenants, yet; they kept quiet and did not tip area police about their apprehensions.

Under the circumstances there is a dire need for motivating general public, to remain extra -vigilant in playing their role of defending the motherland, by involvement of entire population of the country, to look out for the stay and suspicious activities of the terrorist, in their near vicinity.

As such, In order to make the stay of terrorists at any place almost impossible, it is proposed to actively involve the entire population to look out & hunt them.

This objective can be easily achieved, by the announcement of the Government, that a reward of Rs.50 millions [now recommended tax free Rs.100 Million] shall be paid to any person, who informs the Police/security agencies about the terrorist staying in a house, hostel, hotel, rest house or any such place.

If the war against terror is to be won quickly, the entire population of the country have to be geared up and involved in the task of watch and vigilance.

This war can not be won, alone, by our security agencies.

Best Regards,
Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
PS…Enemy likes Eid days..!
The first PAF jet fighter to shoot down an enemy aircraft was F-86F Sabre No 55-005 of No 15 Squadron, the unit also known as the “Cobras”. Flying this aircraft, Flight Lieutenant M Younis downed an Indian Air Force Canberra while it was on a photo reconnaissance mission high over the Rawalpindi area on 10 April 59, an Eid day. Pilot Officer Rab Nawaz was the Air Defence Controller on radar for this mission.
On Friday, 1 December, 2017 our enemy again selected the Auspicious day of the Eid Milad un Nabi to attack students hostel of an institution in Peshawar.
Our coward enemy is mistaken that it can find Pakistanis off guard on Eid days.

9 May 2019

Link:-https://www.snayyar.com/avoidable-suicide-terrorist-attacks-a-proposal-of-the-year-2010.html

In this regard, the PCB may consider as below, a recipe for winning all the three Test Matches, Three ODI’s and lone T20I match.

1. Positive Attitude.

Defensive minds are neither creative nor cooperative. Until and unless we only focus on nothing short of winning (and consider a DRAW as a DEFEAT) no planning and preparation, will give us the desired results.

2. Planning.

The team management in particular and players in general must be told that PLANS never fail, rather we fail to PLAN. And for planning, the first and foremost thing is the mind set, totally focused on goal achievement. In order to achieve the impossible, it is precisely imperative, to think the unthinkable.

3. Video Analysis.

All concerned must sit and watch strengths and weaknesses of Australian players, as well as, Pakistani players. This will not only help in overcoming our weaknesses, but will also help in field settings, determining bowling line and length, knowing weakness of opponent players, against fast and spin bowling etc.

4. Infusion of Motivation.

Since, cricket is a mind game, a motivation specialist (NOT psychiatrist) must be attached with the team, with the task to convert our players, from being simply dynamic persons to a DYNAMITE personality, so that every player must perform, to his peak ability. In my opinion, the best person in the country, for this job is Ms Andleeb Abbas.

5. Team Selection.

(a) The success of any project depends on the right selection of it’s team members. The enemy of the BEST is often the GOOD. In fact, now it is said that the only difference between winning and losing organizations is the quality of it’s people, which includes their character, belief, habits, personal motivation and abilities.

(b) We should not only select players on merit or past performances but, one or two batsmen and bowlers from domestic circuit should also be selected for not only T20I match but for Test and ODI matches, as well (like batsman/WK Haris and speedster Irshad who has the ability to bowl 4-5 lethal Yorker balls in an over ) just anticipating, that given a chance, they can be stars overnight with their sheer fearlessness and big game temperament. Just like as a shrewd jeweler, we should pick a diamond from the rubbles.

6. Team Management.

The team management must be told that business as usual, will not deliver in this most tough series in which all the Test & ODI matches victories will give us valuable points for enabling us to play the finals of the Championship finals, as such, these matches are doubly important for Pakistan. They should know that management is doing THINGS RIGHT. Leadership is doing the RIGHT THINGS. Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; Leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall.

Best regards,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
0321-9402157
Lahore

“A silver-tongued charlatan and a half-wit society are made for each other! When these two come together in an election, a great disaster happens: Charlatan comes to power!”
― Mehmet Murat ildan

In the recent past, it appears that I may have offended a lot of people by my suggestions on a technocrat/national/NSC style government. My recommendations seem to have affected numerous stake holders whose lives apparently may be radically encroached upon if these recommendations ever see the light of day.  I apologize to those who I seem to have hurt by my insensitivity towards their plight, where status quo serves them best and must never be changed. All the same, I will try and justify my position in a better manner and hope to make more sense than before. Yet there are others too have based their argument against my recommendations only because of my association with the Army and rejected my views on account of that association alone. They have then used the occasion to unfairly bash the Armed Forces, conveying their messages through me, who they take, as a representative of the Armed Forces. It is why, I am constrained, to not only clear my own position on the subject but that of the Army as well of which I am neither a spokesman or a representative in any way. However, this paper should not be seen as one in defence of the Armed Forces but more for explaining the original concept of administrative changes recommended.
Some of the arguments against my proposal and which need to be addressed are:

1.       The process and recommendation are unconstitutional: I do not think they are, and whatever adjustments that need to be made would have to be done through a constitutional route and would remain a product of legislation. How this would be done needs to be worked out but it can be done and is a separate study.  After all, inclusion of the Objectives Resolution into the constitution was done by a dictator simply to satisfy his whim?  Then the 18th and the 13th amendment that removed Article 58 (2) B from the Constitution was a radical alteration done by a parliament to serve its own ends. There has been no turning back since and with no check and balance, the government in chair is allowed free-for-all to every resource, its distribution and its application. At any rate, the Constitution, which everyone holds sacrosanct, is violated with impunity on several occasions when one studies Article 62 and 63 specially with reference to dual nationality, default payments and education standards. In fact, implementation of Article 62 and 63 remains a moot point since most legislators would be disqualified if the law was implemented in letter and spirit.
 
2.       Then for those who have objected to my association with the Army and they feel that a retired officer has no right to give his opinion; I cannot apologize for my past and will not. I am proud of my military background and if given an opportunity, would never change that life for another. Some people have exposed their ignorance by lamenting, ‘Why was he silent when in service’. For their education, it’s a norm and practice within the service that one does not voice his opinion in public. It’s not a talk show. Yet an officer, who stands on his honor and dignity, always voices his opinion and shares his reservations at an appropriate forum. His views can be summarily dismissed, accepted, ignored or rejected. That’s how the military works.  Nevertheless, by which law, norm or practice are retired military personal debarred from giving an opinion? It’s an opinion, that’s all and must not be confused with an executive order. I have failed to understand, that where a country can have a dentist as a President and a cricketer as a Prime minister (which, incidentally, is a good thing), why would some people like to single out retired military personal from even suggesting a solution to the problems of the country?
 
3.       People feel that the system we have is good enough and that it is delivering or may do so, in the near future. I am willing to accept this argument; if this is what all want, then who am I to suggest that it be changed or altered? Let it then continue in the better interest of the nation and the well-being of its people, which is apparently visible, within this system, to some. My suggestions, for an alternative form of government, was only in the event that there was a general consensus that the current system was not working. By watching what’s on TV and listening to people on the street, I am still convinced that the system is dysfunctional but I concede that I could be wrong. Others feel that we must stop ‘experimenting’ and should carry on as we are but as we look at it, the economy, the fiscal situation, inflation, unabated corruption, depreciation of the Rupee, all point towards a dysfunctional government. For less fault of its own but more on account of accumulated follies of the past, the Government has arrived at a point, where it no longer enjoys any functional depth. It is not in a position to provide relief to society and the country, in real terms, because all options have been exhausted. Thus not doing anything, or changing the way we do business, to me, is not an option but a road to self-inflicted injury and disaster.
 
4.       People protested at the recommendations that I had made but not a single argument rebutted anything I had proffered. I was constrained to conclude that the objections were motivated more because of who I was, than what I was suggesting. Thus criticism was directed more towards my person, which is fine with me, since I had chosen to go public and thus natural that I expose myself to all kinds of emotions, but this kind of criticism does not lead to any constructive conclusion. One argument could be that no change is needed, to which I have already conceded if that’s what the majority want but there could still be other arguments leading to alternatives to what I had suggested and that would have not only been welcome but could have allowed for an informed and sensible debate.  I came away with the impression that people had taken a position and were not willing to give up that position regardless of any logic, reason or rational presented.
 
5.       Some others felt that the Presidential System never worked in the past. I tried to explain, that what I was recommending was a package that was based on reforms and not just a Presidential System. These reforms included judicial reforms, de-politicization of the police, smaller provinces, accountability, meritocracy, changes to the Constitution, separating religion from the State functions. Thus the System being recommended was not just bringing in a presidential system. Yet, on the other hand, in my opinion, Pakistan developed fastest and did the best in President Ayub’s time. We got Warsak, Mangla and Tarbela Dams, PIA was the number one airline in the world, Pakistan’s industrial growth was the fastest in the region, we had a very strong diplomatic presence the world over and our economic growth was impressive. He subsidized fertilizers, modernized agriculture, developed the world’s largest canal irrigation system, spurred industrial growth by liberal tax benefits and the GNP rose by 45%.  Then there was the Zia era, whereas, I cannot agree with his Islamization of Pakistan but all the same, the economy did reasonably well, he commanded unprecedented respect in the OIC and he managed the Afghan War considerably well. Then there was the Musharaf era, and again the economy did well but mistakes were made in handling the judiciary and supporting the MQM, yet by and large Pakistan was doing much better then, than what we see today. Nevertheless, I am fully cognizant that people will not agree with my evaluation, despite that facts and figures that can be studied, verified, measured and compared simply because of the positions taken. However, I have neither proposed a Presidential system without the reforms that I have suggested, nor have I insisted that this was the only way forward and instead, have remained open to any other suggestions or alternatives that could either improve, replace or modify whatever I have proposed.
 
6.       Instead of offering alternative views, opinions and arguments in the wake of my recommendations some have deliberately used the occasion to attack the Army. The weight of these opinions is evident by the divide we see displayed on the TV daily. Half attack the Army for supporting the government, which it should do in any case, being part of the government, and the other half attack the Army for supporting the PML(n). Such radically opposed opinions can only be seen as frivolous and childish, selectively applied to support relative political arguments. Then of course there some silly arguments that must not be allowed to muddy the water. One being, that I should explain the 1971 War as if Pakistan having lost the 1971 War somehow mitigates my suggestion for a better governance system for the country. In fact, I can explain the breakup of Pakistan but neither is that the substance of our discussion nor am I the person who has the answers to it. I was commissioned in 1977, how does that make me relevant to 1971 War and why should it? There are also people who love to bash their own Army – ‘they never won a war’. I would recommend such people to first read, if they can, and then understand the mission and objective of the Army; ‘To deter war through conventional means and to defend the territorial integrity of the Country if attacked’. Nowhere does it order the Army to fight a War somewhere else in the world but if the people want that, I am sure the Army would not fall short of their expectations provided they are willing to weather the consequences. Nevertheless, the Pakistan Army is the world’s largest and most popular military contingent in the United Nations, the world over. It is the only Army which evacuated 2.5 million people from their homes in Swat and resettled them in Rustam, Mardan, conducted operations in Mingora, cleared the area and supervised the return of the people within 3 months. Something unprecedented in military history anywhere in the world. It was also the only Army standing its ground at the end of the day in the War against Terror after a US led International Coalition of 38 Countries failed in Afghanistan. Distractors would say, ‘That’s conquering your own land’ – well that is the nature of modern war, it’s called Low Intensity Warfare. The Arab Spring was a product of this war. It devastated Tunisia, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Jordan and many more – very few realize that Pakistan was on the menu, that maps were drawn up showing a Pakistan divided into four regions. It is time to set aside prejudices and acknowledge that the Army fared well and established the writ of the Government as well as peace all over, keeping the country united and stable under very trying circumstances.
 
7.       My association with the Army in no way makes me a spokesman for the Establishment or the Army, nor is it my desire to be one. My views are my own, motivated by own experiences, familiarities and exposures, just as any other citizen of Pakistan. The Army neither needs me to defend or promote its point of view, which in any case, may very well be at a tangent to the conventional thought or standard practices of the system in vogue that I may have in mind. Nevertheless, unfair criticism and downright lies must be addressed by those who are in the know of military matters since these create a negative perception that is false. Perceptions are more important than reality because we mount a course of action on a perception. People attentively listen to a hostile Indian retired major Guarav Arya’s narrative as opposed to Pakistan’s own. Well this may be disappointing to some distractors but there are no islands in Australia in possession of any senior leadership. In fact, there are no such islands anywhere.  An average officer of Pakistan Army of any rank does not resettle abroad but remains rooted to his own country. Unlike other institutions, no serving officer has dual nationality or is in possession of foreign citizenship. Of course there are odd cases of wrong doings but these are exceptions and exceptions never make the rule – the bulk do. Also the Army is not structured on angels and there are cases of corruption and misappropriation. The Army is structured on rules, regulations and laws which are implemented in the functioning of the Army, however, some individuals do manage to circumvent the system. Most people are who are involved are held accountable – yet some get away. However, this does not reflect on the Army in general in its conduct, character or demeanor. The signature of a relative corruption free Army lies in the punctuality of the rank and file, that no vehicle stops because it has no fuel, that no activity is canceled because of misuse of resource, that no man is denied his share of rations and that pay and allowances are assured and always in time. The Army stands out as it did in the rehabilitation of the country after the 2005 earthquake. There was international recognition of how the Army conducted itself and it is now a common example quoted as a best practice all over the world. The handling of the floods in 2010 were no less a feat and one can go on with many examples. Some people, cannot find it within themselves to appreciate anything that the Army may do and justify the Army’s performance in aid to civil power as a norm. No it’s not a norm, especially when all other institutions are dysfunctional and lack the will, capacity or capability to handle a crisis.  Everywhere, civil administration handles disasters and is only reinforced by the armed forces if so needed. The armed forces are never a front line response agency to be the first and the only ones dealing with a disaster. It’s alright to be critical but trying to attack your own Army for no apparent reason, serves no purpose – after all, your country will always have an Army in it, if not yours – it will be someone else’s.
 
8.       So moving on to the substance of the matter. My proposals to dissolve the assemblies and have a suitably modified NSC run the country was never intended to usher in a direct or indirect martial law, which a lot of people are accusing me of. To me, the suggestion, remains within the Constitution and is only way to undertake reforms through a technocrat-national government to stabilize the country and ensure that a direction is determined for its future development and progress. I am apolitical and as such have no preferences but the fact of the matter is that system has become so corrupted that it is now dysfunctional. It cannot deliver. Hard decisions have to be made which the current system will never support even if we have an angel sitting on the top. The system I have recommended has been the savior of many other nations including the Asian Tigers – Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Taiwan. No country in the world has recovered from the bad situation such as what we are in today through the practices that we follow and if there is any such example, I would love to be educated on it.  Technocrat governments world over have come into place to help their nations recover from some crisis or other and examples that can be studied with countries that have technocracy are Germany, Italy, Greece and the Czech Republic, amongst many others. The process of stabilization and recovery should lead to a Presidential system later. The Quaid wanted such a system and considered it the most suited for Pakistan and this is in writing. The presidential system exists in many countries of the world and is a product of democracy so I do not understand why such a hullabaloo about it here in Pakistan. To rubbish the recommendations proffered on the basis that it is martial law, unconstitutional, experimental or something unheard of, actually is no argument. People who are critical of change are either those who have most to lose and least to gain by such a change, or then those who have fallen victim to the propaganda of the naysayers.
 
Pakistan is in a difficult situation – far more than it has been in the past and over the years. Business as usual will not help the country recover from where it has fallen to. Institutions such as the IMF can now dictate how the country ought to conduct its affairs. Who does not know today that the IMF just as the UN, is the veritable authority of the United States and will promote only the interests of the United States. Very soon our red lines, sacrosanct to our independent standing, autonomous presence and sovereignty will be violated by our very own leaders in a quest to survive as the tongue-in-cheek justification. This will include the nuclear capability, economic cooperation with China and our stand on Kashmir. The recommendations that have been proffered are in relevance to these matters – to give Pakistan a chance to stand on its own feet, make its own decisions and be a proud nation. 

Those formulating government’s National Security Policy must be told in absolutely unambiguous words that just like wars are not only fought and won by the military alone, but it was a collective national effort; the National Security Policy’s formulation without the inclusive input of the public representatives and the country’s Academia and intelligentsia, is like a dead wood and remains a body without its soul.

The article written by Durdana Najam titled “Wages of the IMF” Published in The Express Tribune, December 2^nd, 2021. link at :-https://tribune.com.pk/story/2331970/the-wages-of-the-imf is an eye opener for our Prime Minister Mr. Imran Khan, who is surrounded by such persons who have succeeded in creating a fear psychosis in the mind of previously a fearless person that if, we don’t tread on the IMF’s path, we won’t be able to come out of FATF’s straight jacket (which otherwise also won’t be possible) and also other lenders, will show their back on us. 

ANOTHER ARTICLE TITLED “

Economics of unconventional warfare” by Dr. Akmal Hussain published in the The News International, May 19, 2019 link:-https://www.thenews.com.pk/amp/473064-economics-of-unconventional-warfare  is a BIGGER EYE OPENER for Pakistan. Few excerpts are quoted as below:

Quote:“Let us see how the IMF fits into the US system of national power. The IMF claims that its policy is dictated by its membership of about 150 countries. But Roland Vaubel, who has researched the behaviour of the IMF, has argued that the ‘accountability’ of the IMF is according to the percentage of votes the member has, with the top ten members now having 54 percent of the votes. However the policy of the IMF over the years has become increasingly discretionary. Babb and Buira argue that this discretion is exercised in response to the demands of the IMF’s “most powerful organisational constituent: the US Treasury”.

James Raymond Vreeland in his 2007 book on the IMF’s politics of lending suggests that the managing director “rarely acts against the will of the US, since the US has veto power over his appointment and reappointment”. There is a whole corpus of work by scholars such as Cheryl Payer (1974) and Richard Swedberg (1986), which suggests that the IMF is used by the US for political objectives.

Recently a quite remarkable document has been made public by Julian Assange at Wikileaks, which shows clearly that the IMF is a key element in the pursuit of US strategic objectives. Indeed it is integral to the US Special Forces Unconventional War operations. The document is titled: Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare, Headquarters Department of the Army, September 2008, FM 3-05.130

The ‘unconventional war manual’ of the US in Chapter 2 makes the eminently sensible proposition that the agency that controls finance, wields power. The document then shows that “…ARSOF (Army Special Operations Forces) can use financial power as a weapon in times of conflict… “It goes on to say: “Financial incentives and disincentives can build and sustain international coalitions waging or supporting US Unconventional War campaigns” and, most interestingly, “Participation in international financial organisations such as the World Bank (WB), International Monetary Fund ( IMF), Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), offers the US diplomatic-financial venues to accomplish such coalitions”.

What is the geo-strategic context in which the above mentioned three elements of unconventional war have been brought into play as a means of putting pressure on Pakistan to support US strategic goals in the region? A key strategic aim of the US is to counter the rapidly growing economic, political and diplomatic influence of China as it emerges as a global power. In this regard, first it is in the US interests to build up India as a dominant power in South Asia to act as a counter weight to China. Second, in the 140-country global connectivity network that China is building, CPEC is a key component. It is in the US interest to block or slowdown progress on CPEC. This is because apart from the trade and investment implications of CPEC, the Gwadar Port at the end of the north-south corridor would provide China with naval access over the Indian Ocean which is seen as the principal theatre for military contention amongst the major powers in the 21st century.

Third, the US would like Pakistan to use its influence with the Afghan Taliban to help the US to achieve a face saving exit from Afghanistan. Fourth, the US would like to get Pakistan to give its political and military support to the US confrontation against Iran in the Straits of Hormuz.

If Pakistan in the first few weeks of the PTI government had effectively apprised China, Saudi Arabia and UAE about the critical urgency of a financial support package of $25 billion to avoid an economic meltdown, given their strategic stakes, that support would have been forthcoming. Pakistan could also have informed China that in the absence of that support there was a danger of destabilization through an IMF package. A destabilization that would not only hold back CPEC but also change the regional balance of power in favour of India and the US.” Unquote.

Under these threats, our Prime Minister  is also fully convinced, now in the favour of IMF and considers IMF as our saviour; whereas, earlier, he was totally against going into the trap of the IMF.

Now, the best solution is that this matter should be settled once for ever in a nation wide televised debate of a joint sitting of the parliament, where those economists and financial experts (Dr. Ikramul Haq, Dr. Akmal Hussain, Dr. Ashfaque Hasan Khan, Professor Dr. Shahida Wizarat and others) should be given an opportunity to present a doable action plan, for taking our country out of the current economic morass by avoiding unnecessary and bone crushing stringent conditionality’s of the IMF and FATF, which are now NOT only a REAL THREAT to our society as a whole, including threat to the national security and our nuclear arsenals, as well. 

In this debate let ALL those economic Czars (inside and outside the government) also be allowed to participate to put their view point for taking our country out of the current pathetic economic situation as also narrated by Abdul Rauf Shakoori & Dr Ikramul Haq in an article titled “Navigating through economic landmines” at link :-https://www.thenews.com.pk/amp/906548-navigating-through-economic-landmines (which is inflicting unbearable miseries and pains to not only the poorest of the poor but to the middle and upper middle class also) by blindly following the dictations of the IMF officials, who have virtually and operationally taken over government affairs to the extent that now, they are dictating which matters need to get approval from the parliament and which constitutional approvals are required to be passed by the law makers to allow a cake walk for their Economic Hitmen in Pakistan, whose independence is now just hanging by a thread.

NA SHAMJHOO GAY TOU MIT JAOO GAY AYY PAKISTAN WALOO
TUMHAREE DASTAN TAK NA HOOGY DASTAANOO MEIN


Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com

2 June 2020
The magic and influence of REM’s

Respected Prime Minister Mr. Imran Khan Sahab.

AoA.

Sir,

According to an estimate the wealth of Rare Earth Metals in Pakistan is so huge that it can make us one of the richest nation of the world, within a short span of time.

We have been constantly bringing to your kind notice, almost for the last two years, highlights about the importance of “Rare Earth Metals” in the world arena and the urgent need for a “Rare Earth Metal Authority of Pakistan” considering very bright indications of its availability in our country.

Now today an Indian newspaper has published an eye opening news item titled “If flexed, China’s “rare” muscle can cripple global industry”
Link:- https://www.indiatoday.in/business/story/if-flexed-china-s-rare-muscle-can-cripple-global-industry-1684817-2020-06-02

In this regard, it is once again requested that necessary orders may be issued for immediate establishment of the “REM Authority of Pakistan“ which should directly work under the PMO, so as to turnaround the fortunes of the country in the minimum possible time.

In this connection, the last message addressed to you is reproduced below for ready reference please.

Dated 3 March 2020
Respected Mr. Imran Khan
Sahab.

AoA.

Sir,

Keeping in view the huge potential of Rare Earth Metals in the country (approximate value of total minerals except oil & gas in our country is over $50 trillion) we urgently need an independent & autonomous authority, directly reporting to the PM, for the exploration, mining, refining & world wide sales & marketing of the REM’s.

In this regard, the myths and disinformation about the REM’s as explained by the renowned geologist, Dr. Imran Khan, are reproduced as below:

Quote.

“FOUR BASIC FACTS ABOUT RARE EARTH METALS”

1. Among Rare Earth Metals, only the metal Promethium is radioactive.
2. Rare Earth Metals are usually not found in association with Uranium and Thorium.
3. Exploration work in District Buner, KPK showed that 12 out of 17 Rare Earth Metals are found there but there is no Uranium or Thorium.
4. There is every likelihood of finding REMs in association with coal deposits in Sindh and KPK but there is no Uranium or Thorium.”

Unquote.

Warm Regards,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

Still not late to correct our Qibla..!

20 October 2018
20 October 2018

Subject:- IMF loan is like scoring self goal..!

Dear Mr. Imran Khan Sahab,

AoA.

Sir,

It is really baffling to comprehend that the government of PTI and its Finance team is only looking towards the governments of Kingdom of Saudia Arabia and China (as a last resort) to help Pakistan meet its requirements of foreign exchange, before finally going to the IMF for loan.

Sir, let me once again inform you that the conditions of getting loans from IMF has all the potential to destabilise your government sooner than later, by making it highly unpopular among the masses, due to back breaking increase in rates of utilities, which will push further millions of lower middle class, to upper level of poverty and poor class to the abject poverty level.
In view of the foregoing, you are once again requested to kindly replace your entire Finance team (which has no capacity to go beyond easy way outs) and give the highly challenging task to a new team led by a dynamic man with world view and extremely good connections in the western world and China like Dr. Ikram ul Haq to avert the national financial crisis, by considering following out of the box suggestions, to take Pakistan out of its straitjacket.

1 (a). Pakistan was economically devastated in fighting the American/NATO imposed War on Terror (as a front line State) suffering over $ one trillion losses in the shape of losses of human lives, financial and opportunity costs and damages to its goodwill and infrastructure; one example of which is that during this period Bangladesh moved ahead in education, family planning (1% population growth) and exports (45 billion USD/ year) which consisted mainly of textiles, by getting competitive edge over our textile industry, with zero percent tax for BD produced textile items (in developed countries) like towels and bedsheets etc., while Pakistani textiles were charged 20% tax, resultantly our products became uncompetitive and exports reduced from 25 billion USD to 20 billion USD per year.

1(b). In view of the foregoing, rather than going for borrowing from IMF we should seek (with diplomatic help as well) a moratorium on repayment of loans for five years and side by side implement the following scheme, to build up our foreign exchange reserves, so that economic crisis could be overcome with some out of box thinking to tackle the economic crisis from both supply and demand sides:

1(C). Immediate launching of a scheme for payment of 3% to 5% PA profit (payable bi-annually) on Foreign Currency bank deposits in Pakistan (backed by the sovereign guarantee of the GoP) with a suitable, but attractive fixed period, as suggested below:
~3% PA profit on deposits up to 2 million USD.
~3.5% Profit on deposits over 2 million USD and up to 3 million USD.
~4% profit on deposits over 3 million USD and up to 4 million USD.
~4.5% profit on deposits over 4 million USD and up to 5 million USD.
~5% profit on deposits over 5 million USD.

~The profits on the above scheme should be payable in the USD and should be exempted from ALL taxes and other deductions, as is also the case with Euro and Sukook Bonds, issued by the GoP.

This is a fool proof scheme, sans any risk, [if at all if fails, government will bear no loss] which can boost up our foreign reserves, in a very short time, on extremely cheap rates, as compared to the foreign loans and international bonds, which were sold by the previous government of PMLN, at even 8.25% interest rates: plus undisclosed Tax Exemptions of at least minimum benefits of around 7% (Pakistan will be repaying USD 910 million for USD 500 million Euro Bonds) for which the then PM Mian Nawaz Sharif was requested to hold an inquiry, to fix the responsibility of the culprit(s), who allowed the sale of Euro Bonds, on such a criminally high interest rates.

2. Pakistan may approach REBO Bank and IDB which offer funding at extremely low interest rates of 1% and 2% respectively. Here it must be remembered that although, IMF needs 0.9% interest to cover expenses on loans, yet, harsh conditions it charged 3% interest to Pakistan on its last loan to Pakistan.
3. Pakistan may have tried to get funds from the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), which is operated from Beijing, China.
4. We may consider pledging gold with China or any suitable country for obtaining loan against gold, as India did in July 1991, when Reserve Bank of India pledged 46.91 tonnes of gold with the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan to raise $400 million.
5. As detailed proposal has already been submitted to you vide emails titled “Suggestions to recover Pakistani wealth stashed abroad” link:- https://www.snayyar.com/suggestions-to-recover-pakistani-wealth-stashed-abroad.html#sthash.mBhTyTki.dpbs
6. Billions of USD can be easily generated by selling the government lands recently taken back from the encroachers or the government may consider selling the prime properties of President House, vast chunks from the hundreds of Kanals of PM House, the Governor House Lahore or the Prime value land of GOR-1 in Lahore, where in a suitable area, a luxurious world class residential tower can be built, for the residence of the government officers.

Best Regards,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.
20 October 2018

Sent from my iPhone