Loud Thinking

Archive for the ‘India Peace and Pakistan’ Category

Another Muslim today killed by Hindu terrorists in India.

Pakistan should enforce sports boycott of India in protest of daily genocide of Muslims under Modi regime.

It seems that the daily systematic killings of Muslims in India is the continuity of Muslims massacre in Gujarat, when Narendra Modi was the ruler of Gujarat province of India.

An old sincere advice to India, which will always remain pertinent.

Indian PM said money doesn’t grow on trees. It does grow on a tree named PEACE However it is gobbled up by a ghost named WAR.

India is a much much larger country with a very small heart; and even a smaller mind. However, the fact remains, that there can be no peace in the sub-continent, without the consent of India.

Pakistan is already continuously in a state of war, since 1979; and is hardly making its both ends meet. Under the prevalent situation, India had two choices.

Firstly, to go the easy way of further destabilizing Pakistan, by reducing relations to the bare minimum, keep building physical pressure on Pakistan, with acts of sabotage and insurgency from its bases in Afghanistan; and through its international stooges, like the current government of Bangladesh.

Secondly, India had the chance to offer sincere hand of friendship, help and extend support to Pakistan, so that it comes out of its quagmire.

If India had opted for the second option, no doubt Pakistan would have been indebted to India forever; with the result that most importantly, the Kashmir issue, which has become such a financial and political burden for India, would have been eased out much peacefully and amicably, than one could ever have imagined.

Besides the foregoing, the huge gains of economic and political mileage to India, may have made it a bigger player in the world arena, than China.

India’s export target of USD 200 billion for year 2010-11 seems far behind, if compared with China, whose exports in a single month exceeds USD 200 billion.

The main secret of China’s exceptional economic performance is its peace policy towards Taiwan. For India, if it has decided not to play as a second fiddle to China, peace with Pakistan, should be the corner stone of its foreign & economic policy.

The present policy of just buying time to wait and see Pakistan falling down is in fact, hurting India more in economic & strategic terms.

Just imagine, the shape of India & its influence in the world if, at present, its exports were for example USD 3000-3600 billion per annum. It is high time India recognized its potential, realized the dividends of peace and must not settle for less, more so when both, China & Pakistan are nuclear powers.

Moreover, India must have that much self confidence that even if Pakistan wants, it can’t conquer India. So, the onus is on the bigger neighbor to go an extra mile, in pursuit of peace and as a minimum, immediately allow viewing of all Pakistani TV channels in India, restoration of full sporting and cultural relations and unilateral withdrawal of all its military from Siachin; and then see the un-imaginable dividends of these steps.

For Pakistan, acrimony in relations with India is no more an option and similarly for India shallow peace initiatives is a mere time waster.

The only option for India is GENUINE & AUTHENTIC peace in the region from Afghanistan to SriLanka. In this way, the biggest dividend which will accrue to India is the change of Chinese attitude towards India, as well.

So, India must see the intrinsic benefits of peace and shun any hegemonic designs, with not only Pakistan, but all it’s neighbors.

Nowadays, even a country like Bhutan can’t be invaded; so, why to waste so much resources on military matters, when the strength of a nation lies in eliminating poverty and ignorance, like Switzerland, which doesn’t even possesses a regular Army and easily survived in both world wars.

Still, India is banking on its policy of playing the waiting game, to make Pakistan as much week as possible, so that in future, it’s status is no more than the state of Bhutan.

Here, again the myopic Indian policy, which is basically pursued because of lack of any statesman in India, is keeping hundreds of teeming millions of sub-continent, into poverty and ignorance.

Firstly, India must remember that a stable and progressive Pakistan, standing on its own strong feet, is far more in benefit for India, rather than the vice versa.

Secondly, covert or overt war is not a viable and sensible option, either for India or Pakistan; and this is an absolutely ruled out option as well.

Thirdly, it’s the rule of nature that any larger nation focussing all it’s energy and resources, in competition with a smaller nation, drags itself, at least mentally, to the level of that small country.

The decadent myopic policy of waiting game, to see the demise of nuclear Pakistan, is not going to serve India, either in short or long term.

So, my advice to the Indian leadership and intellegensia is, to not only think and act like a large nation, but, also to behave like a large country.

Sorry India/RAW your slip is showing..!

India’s claim of arresting a ‘Pakistani suspect’, who their sensationalist film-style news media termed ‘Kasab 2’, has turned out to be false as reports have shown that the accused in custody belongs to the Indian-held Kashmir (IHK) district of Kulgam and is mentally incapacitated, Geo News reported.

The young man arrested from Udhampur for his involvement in an attack on a convoy of the Indian security forces is a resident of IHK. Senior journalist and anchor for Geo News programme ‘Capital Talk’ Hamid Mir said the young man was a resident of Ghat village located in Kulgam district of IHK near the Jhelum River. The senior journalist also revealed that the attacker had worked as a bus conductor and was known popularly in the area as ‘Jhalla’ (mad person).

According to Hamid Mir, nine relatives of the attacker are among the 15 people arrested from the village. The attacker’s immediate family has fled the village.

Sources told Hamid Mir that the second attacker, Nauman, who was killed, is also a resident of IHK and that the plan of attack was made in Ghat village. Indian media had claimed that this second attacker was also Pakistani, belonging to Bahawalpur.

The Indian media had labelled the attacker as “Kasab 2” after the lone surviving gunman from the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

Indian Home Minister Shri Rajnath Singh also claimed the identity of the captured individual to be Mohammad Naveed Yakub aka Usman, resident of Faisalabad in Pakistan.

Pakistan’s National Database and Registration Authority (Nadra) dismissed Indian allegations stating that Usman is not Pakistani.

The Pakistan Foreign Office said that the Indian media has always engaged in anti-Pakistan propaganda, adding that Pakistan has repeatedly stated that blaming Pakistan for everything is not right.

 

cross post from pakpotpourri1

Why Pakistan is not demanding from India such details of the 18/2 Samjhota Express burning in 2007?

Times of India reports:( http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Modi-Sharif-talks-Top-10-highlights/articleshow/48015511.cms ) that Pakistan agrees to India’s demand to provide voice samples of the accused of the 26/11 Mumbai attack.

Mr. Modi you are striving for “make in India” just see below a glimpse of MADE IN PAKISTAN..!

MADE IN PAKISTAN: Pakistan’s contribution to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) – the world’s largest and most powerful particle collider, the largest and most complex experimental facility ever built, and the largest single machine in the world – situated at the underground CERN facility in Switzerland and France. Photo shows a high-rate Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC) installed in the LHC, which was designed jointly by the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) and the National Centre for Physics (NCP), Islamabad, and manufactured at the Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC), Taxila, Pakistan. Out of a total of 300 RPCs installed in the LHC, 245 (plus 43 spares) were manufactured in Pakistan. Pakistan won the contract for 288 RPCs by beating competitive bids from Chinese and Japanese firms, including Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The LHC is being used to trace the origins of the Universe and, in 2012, led to the discovery of the sub-atomic particle known as the Higgs-Boson, or the “God Particle”.

Shame on India for lying to the world..!

Indian lies have no legs..!

Hope the world remembers that on the first day it was reported by India that they conducted a joint operation of Indian and Myanmar Forces inside Myanmar.

Later on, India retracted and said no, it was only Indian operation conducted by its own forces.

Now the Indian ballon has been finally pricked by the following statements of Myanmar and NSCN-K authorities that:

This so-called operation was conducted on Indian Soil and NOT in the area of Myanmar..!

Further, the statement of NSCN-K that areas shown in the TV footages were non-existent and they don’t have areas with coconut trees and well-maintained footpaths or gardens, has blown the myth of the Indian fantasy to smithereens.

Dear Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif Sahab,

AoA.

Sir,

There is no doubt that currently Pakistan is fighting a full fledged proxy war on its soil, imposed by its enemies, since the last about 15 years.

In this regard, I still wonder how and who allowed India to strengthen its foothold in Afghanistan, despite a categorical statement of Mr. Pervaiz Musharraf, the then President of Pakistan that our cooperation with the NATO’s war on terror in Afghanistan was conditioned with “No role of India in NATO’s WOT in Afghanistan”.

Anyhow, by the Grace of Allah, we have successfully survived the nefarious designs of our arch enemies for a period, which is many years more than the combined duration of the two world wars.

However, since the official launch of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) India seems to be behaving like a mad dog and there were reports in social media that Indian authorities have even given go ahead to its agencies to arm their assets with small nuclear weapons, for use against Pakistan to disrupt the CPEC, detailed as below:

Under the circumstances we can easily say that India has not only declared a war against Pakistan, but it has allowed the launch of nuclear weapons (albeit through its paid agents), as per the timing of its own choice.

As such, although, we are fighting Indian sponsored guerrilla war against the terrorists, on our soil, yet, we should be fully prepared for Indian chemical, biological and nuclear attacks, launched by its proxies.

In this regard, I will request you to kindly take the following actions:

1. Take the whole nation in complete confidence by addressing a joint session of the parliament.

2. Form a war cabinet.

3. Inform all the international powers, the UNO and all our neighbours the genesis of the grave crisis and Pakistan’s expected responses (or its threshold/redlines) to specific threats in different scenarios.

4. Declare India as an enemy country and immediately ban any overflights to and for India by any airlines, along with cessation of all to and fro Indian goods movement to Afghanistan.
This step is necessary because Pakistan can not wait to be a sitting duck for an Indian conventional or non conventional weapons attack, using its proxies. In any war with WMD’s a comparatively small country like Pakistan must repeat must be proactive rather than reactive.

5. Initiate a training and education program for the whole nation, for protection and survival under nuclear, biological or chemical attack. Please do not forget that few years ago, Indian government has already launched such type of exercise in Indian held Kashmir.

6. Since, the new crisis demands a very high level of leadership, the historical facts about the best statesman of the 20th century, are a must read as following, for a man of crisis like you.

 

Churchill: Leader and Statesman

link:- http://www.winstonchurchill.org/the-life-of-churchill/life/churchill-leader-and-statesman

 
He was the lion who roared when the British Empire needed him most.

 

He held many positions during his long career and was an accomplished civil servant. Winston Churchill entered the Royal Military College of Sandhurst, and graduated with honors in December of 18941. He later saw action in Cuba, India, Egypt, Sudan, the front lines of World War I, and even took part in one of the last British cavalry charges in history2. When he turned twenty-five, Churchill was elected to Parliament, and began his career as a statesman in the House of Commons. He went on to serve as First Lord of the Admiralty, Minister of Munitions, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Prime Minster. In his private life, Winston Churchill was an avid reader and scholar, painter, author, journalist, and war correspondent. Historians widely attribute Churchill with being “the greatest statesman of the 20th century.” Churchill was an effective leader and statesman because of his tremendous ability to inspire people; his unique strategic insight; his relentless passion; and his imperturbable personality.

One of Winston Churchill’s chief attributes as a leader was his capability of inspiring people, regardless of seemingly ominous circumstances. The source of this inspiration was his own character. Churchill perpetually demonstrated enthusiasm, determination, and optimism—if not at all times in private, then at least always in public. One of Churchill’s private secretaries spoke of Churchill’s drive:

The effects of Churchill’s zeal was [sic] felt immediately in Whitehall. Government departments which under Neville Chamberlain had continued to work at much the same speed as in peacetime awoke to the realities of war. A sense of urgency was created in the course of very few days and respectable civil servants were actually to be seen running along the corridors. No delays were condoned; telephone switchboards quadrupled their efficiency; the Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Planning Staff were in almost constant session; regular office hours ceased to exist and weekends disappeared with them3.

Churchill’s ability to inspire may be seen in the opening days of World War II. He did not permit a defeatist attitude, nor would he entertain talk of reasonable terms with Adolf Hitler. As Sir Martin Gilbert, Churchill’s official biographer, wrote, “It was Churchill’s own opposition to all forms of defeatism that marked out the first six months of his war premiership and established the nature and pattern of his war leadership.”4 Another example of Churchill’s powers of inspiration was his ability to channel his determination to the British people, and generally strengthen their resolve through enthusiastic encouragement and praise to others. During the opening days of the war he said that, “The British people are like the sea. You can put the bucket in anywhere, and pull it up, and always find it salt.”5 Churchill inspired not only British leaders, but British citizens as well, by projecting an attitude of optimism and stalwart fortitude. Finally, Churchill’s robust optimism is excellently showcased in a speech he made in the House of Commons on June 4, 1940, when he spoke these famous words:

We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender.6

Churchill’s words prompted the Labour MP Josiah Wedgwood to say, “That was worth 1,000 guns, and the speeches of 1,000 years.”7 Churchill’s potent spirit of perseverance and determination is best summed up in one of his own maxims: “We must just KBO.” The initials stood for “Keep Buggering On.”8 Churchill understood the dangers of defeatism and poor morale as a soldier and leader, so he set the example needed to inspire others around him… and he kept “buggering on.”

Winston Churchill was also an effective statesman and leader because he possessed the attribute of strategic foresight. An example of his keen intuition is found in the aftermath of the Munich Agreement. While Neville Chamberlain proclaimed that its policies of appeasement had brought, “peace in our time,” Winston Churchill complained of the terms. He declared that: a) nothing vital was at stake; b) Czechoslovakia could “have hardly got worse” terms in the agreement; and c) the agreement would ultimately not be successful in preserving Europe’s uneasy peace while the threat of Nazi Germany under Hitler still loomed.9 World War II would prove his intuition correct. Despite his misgivings, Churchill, “…never doubted that the Western Alliance would defeat Hitler and subsequently Japan,” and his vision was again clear.10 Another example that showcases Churchill’s strategic foresight is Communist Russia. Churchill had early misgivings about Russia, apart from the ones that he voiced in his famous “Iron Curtain” speech, where he spoke of an iron curtain settling on Eastern Europe. In 1931, Churchill declared in front of a large audience in Brooklyn, New York, that the great struggle of the future would be between English-speaking nations and communism.11 The Cold War would later prove his prophecy correct. A third example of Churchill’s strategic intuition is shown during his time as First Lord of the Admiralty starting in October 1911. Churchill summed up his approach to British naval power in these words:

Adequate preparation for war is the only guarantee for the preservation of the wealth, natural resources, and territory of the State, and it can only be based upon an understanding, firstly, of the probable dangers that may arise; secondly, of the best general method of meeting them as taught by the principles to be deduced from the events of history; and, thirdly, of the most efficient application of the war material of the era.12

Churchill applied this policy to his duties as First Lord of the Admiralty and set about thoroughly preparing Britain’s fleet for war. He also studied German naval progress, strength, and maneuvers. A mere four years later, World War I broke out, and thanks to Churchill’s wisdom, the British Navy was well prepared for battle. In summary, Churchill possessed exceptional strategic foresight, tempered with a healthy dose of realism. As one observer wrote, “Churchill had great foresight, but he knew the future is mostly unpredictable.” 13

While Winston Churchill’s foresight was a critical component of his leadership, there was another factor that elevated all of his talents to the forefront: his passion. Winston Churchill possessed a passion for democratic freedom that drove him to work hard for its preservation, allowing him to be an effective statesman and leader. Perhaps the best example of Churchill’s passion is found in some of the words that he used to inspire people and battle defeatism: “I am convinced that every man of you would rise up and tear me down from my place if I were for one moment to contemplate parley or surrender. If this long island story of ours is to last, let it end only when each one of us lies choking in his own blood on the ground.”14 Churchill’s passion fueled his desire to maximize the efficiency of Britain’s wartime government and bureaucracy. An excellent example of this efficiency is the structural organization that Churchill implemented in the English chain of command. Sir Martin Gilbert writes that:

The organization of his wartime premiership was a central feature of Churchill’s war leadership. That organization took several months to perfect, but from his first days as Prime Minister and Minister of Defense he worked to establish it, and to create in the immediate ambit of 10 Downing Street an organization that would give the nation strong and effective leadership.15

This organization was comprised of different councils, executives, committees, and boards. Each leader in charge of the respective agencies sat on an executive board chaired by Churchill called the Chief of Staff Committee. Once Churchill fine tuned this system, “…the highest possible accumulation of professional knowledge was at his disposal.”16 Churchill’s passion also produced innovation. For example, he prompted the invention of the tank. In order to break the deadlock of the “no-man’s land” of World War I, Churchill suggested that a type of heavy tractor with robust treads be produced from which men could fire machine guns and throw grenades from behind armor plating. This suggestion led to the production of the first tanks. Churchill’s service as a soldier also showcases his passion. During World War I, Churchill served on the frontlines in France as a major with the 2nd Battalion of the Grenadier Guards.17 Eventually, Churchill became the commander of the 6th Royal Scots Fusiliers, a battalion of the 9th Division.18 As a soldier, he possessed a steady, defiant courage, setting an excellent example for his men. When he left France in 1916, one Scotsman from under his command declared that, “I believe every man in the room [at a farewell lunch] felt Winston Churchill’s leaving us a real personal loss.” 19

The last component of Churchill’s remarkable formula for success was his imperturbable personality. Coupled with a dogged determination was a personality that was capable of exuding charm and wit, and that caused people to gravitate toward him. Churchill famously described himself in the following way: “We are all worms but I do believe I am a glow worm.” History shows that he did indeed glow. For example, he was able to maintain a poise in even the most stressful of times:

Churchill’s typists were also to find that, however bad his moods could be in dire moments of the war, he always had words of comfort for them and a ready smile-—his “beatific grin,” as Marian Holmes called it. “Don’t mind me,” he would say after an outburst, “it’s not you—it’s the war.” On one occasion, in November1944, finding Marian Holmes and her colleague Elizabeth Layton working in the Hawtrey Room and Chequers without a fire, he commented, “Oh, you poor things. You must light a fire and get your coats. It’s just as well I came in”— and he proceeded to light the fire himself, piling it high with logs.20

It may be said that Churchill’s personality was the result of a combination of different qualities that produced his witty charm. John B. Severance, a British author on Churchill writes that, “Lots of people have imagination, courage, and tenacity. Few people have them in the amount or combination that Churchill did.”21 Churchill used his unique charm and personality to encourage people to strive hard at their work and to excel in the jobs they were assigned. For example, people visibly displayed their affection for Churchill, as General Ismay recalled in an incident on Downing Street when a large group of people waited outside his private entrance to the Admiralty, and greeted him with cries of encouragement and good luck.22 Churchill’s poise was also displayed in his famous wit. One evening as a tired and wobbly Churchill was leaving the House of Commons, the Labour Member of Parliament Bessie Braddock accused him of being “disgustingly drunk.” He replied: “Bessie, my dear…you are disgustingly ugly. But tomorrow I shall be sober and you will still be disgustingly ugly.”23

World War II, however, is where Churchill’s personality shines the most. He tirelessly travelled to military positions and installations, conducting inspections, boosting morale, and supporting commanders. He also established a personal friendship with Franklin Delano Roosevelt and maintained strong relations and diplomatic ties with the American Government. Through it all, he was able to maintain a cool assurance of victory and instill confidence in everyone around him.

In conclusion, of all the qualities that Churchill displayed, perhaps the most interesting was his unexpected outbursts of humility. While Churchill’s power to inspire, his strategic foresight, his driving passion, and his unstoppable personality were the core qualities that made him an effective leader and statesman, the realization that he too was a “worm” tempered his character and kept him focused. His lifetime spanned not only the two World Wars of the 20th century but other conflicts, historic diplomatic meetings, and the onset of the Cold War. Winston Churchill led the British nation on two separate occasions as prime minister, in peace and in war, and on two separate occasions as First Lord of the Admiralty, both in the office and on the frontline. Yet, he steadfastly refused to take the credit. When cheered at the demise of Nazi Germany, he responded, “I have never accepted what many people have kindly said, namely that I inspired the nation. It was a nation and race dwelling all round that had the lion heart. I had the luck to be called upon to give the roar.”

 

With Kind Wishes and Best Regards,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
29 May, 2015

After the recent arrest by the Pakistani authorities of an Indian national RAW agent (who is actually a Hindu and Indian NAVY intelligence officer infiltrated in Pakistan as a disguised Muslim), the following two things are clear as daylight:

i. India is hell bent on dismemberment of Pakistan; and all its so called peace overtures, are just a ploy to gain time, for its nefarious designs to (God forbid) succeed.

ii. All so called attacks on the Indian soil by the miscreants entering from Pakistan, were Indian RAW engineered and orchestrated false flags, to keep Pakistan isolated internationally; and it will not be a surprise, if, the recently caught RAW Indian NAVY officer operating in Pakistan, will soon be coughing out the details, about the Mumbai attack, in which the Indian sponsored attackers entered India, from the sea side.

It is high time that Pakistan informs the entire world, specially, the five permanent security council members of the UNO; that the Indian government is playing with fire and has in fact, embarked upon an undeclared full fledged war against Pakistan. As such, Pakistan reserves the right to use all resources and assets available at its disposal, to counter this Indian offensive against Pakistan; and as a consequence, if, the world faces the armegaddon, it will be the outcome of the extremely severe Indian provocations, using Indian funded and sponsored insurgents, to attack our sensitive installations, schools, universities and parks killing hundreds of men, women, students and kids.

Pakistan must convey to its enemies the red lines for an all out counter attack without warning..!

The whole world knows from where these terrorists are launched and sponsored, who have killed more than 50,000 Pakistanis in the aftermath of the American invasion of Afghanistan.

However, after the brutal killings of about 45 unarmed and peaceful kids, women and men in a bus in Karachi on 13 May, 2015 one thing is absolutely clear that our known enemies will not refrain till either we surrender before them or we decide to fight fire with fire. In this regards, after the attack on Karachi airport I wrote on 9 June, 2014 quoted as below:

Quote.”This means clearly the use of nuclear and all weapons at our disposal, because we can’t sit idle and witness our own demise, without any punishment to the mischief mongers.”Unquote.

Link:- https://www.snayyar.com/pakistans-cuban-crisis.html#sthash.LaKwxuFG.dpbs
The video of AJIT DOVAL current Indian National Security advisor and former RAW man, specifically tells India’s defensive offensive strategy of spreading terrorism in Pakistan.

link:- https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=898326933533928&id=176100869089875&refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.pk%2F&_rdr

In fact, Daily Mail of London also reported that U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told the Indian PM on his face, all he knew about RAW’s hands in the killings of about 150 kids in a School of Peshawar.

Link:- http://dailymailnews.com/2015/01/14/kerry-snubbed-modi-over-mulla-fazalulla-patronage/

So, there should be no doubt about who is responsible for the killings of INNOCENT kids, men and women in Pakistan.

All these killings have a proven foot print and pattern of RAW’s style of terrorism.
In this regard, I have already written to Mr. Modi.

link:- https://www.snayyar.com/loud-thinking-january-17-2015-at-0916pm.html#sthash.HR6Dza3b.dpbs

to not to provoke and push a nuclear Pakistan for any retaliatory action, which may turn the entire region to ashes, quoted as below:

Quote.”Also please inform all those military and political planners in your country, not in favour of genuine peace with Pakistan that low intensity war named as offensive defensive operations, or other covert hostile methods, are no more a long or short term options for, as well as, against; a nuclear power, which possesses more military nuclear arsenal (as reported today by Times of India) than India.

All such paradigms are out dated being a ZERO sum game, in the ultimate nuclear scenario. Such policy planners have no business to stay in the past non-nuclear status frame of mind; and they must develop a NEW and FRESH vision, to guide a major nuclear nation, like India.

Policy makers of nuclear powers must not have a mindset of a non nuclear state. And the foremost responsibility of these policy makers must be to ensure, at all costs, that under ALL circumstances, nuclear flare up or provocations under offensive defensive doctrine, MUST be ruled out: irrespective of the defined policy of no first use of nuclear weapons or retaliatory use of WMD’s.”Unquote.

According to a latest research study in Washington, if these two countries fought a nuclear war the whole region will cease to exist, quoted as below:

Quote. “Dr Khalid also noted that both India and Pakistan had more than 100 nuclear warheads, enough to destroy the entire region.
The two groups recently conducted a study, which showed that if a nuclear war broke out in this region, “both countries would cease to exist”.
The fallout would cause a famine that would go beyond the region and affect more than three billion people around the globe, the study claimed.” Unquote.

Link:- http://www.dawn.com/news/1179870/pakistan-india-urged-to-rethink-npt-strategy

In view of the foregoing, it is high time that Pakistan convenes an urgent Security Council meeting of the UNO, to clearly inform the whole world: that from now onwards, Pakistan will not exercise any restraint (as it has got all the undeniable proofs of the Indian aggression) to safe guard its security, even if it leads to an Armageddon.

Survival in collective support..!

About half a decade ago, I wrote on 13 August, 2010 that:

Quote.”So any future planning, must also be in coordination with and take care of the interests of the neighbouring nations, because no single country has the capacity to survive the adversities of the nature, alone.” Unquote.

Today’s Great news that
Disaster relief: Nawaz, Modi discuss possible joint efforts

By Web Desk

Published: April 30, 2015
Link:- http://tribune.com.pk/story/878409/disaster-relief-nawaz-modi-discuss-possible-joint-efforts/

My writings of 29 October, 2010 and 13 August, 2010 are as below.

Charter of Pakistan. A Clarion Call for The Survival
October 29, 2010 at 6:38pm

The demand of Mian Nawaz Sharif for a charter of Pakistan is a clarion call. Now the time has come to separate the growth, development, eradication of poverty & security of Pakistan from politics forever.

All other stake holders in Pakistan must immediately come forward for deciding about the direction of the future of the nation. In this regard, I will suggest that, we should aim to bring Pakistan, to the level of Singapore of 2010, by the year 2030.

All politics & considerations should be made subservient to this target for 2030, even if we have to abolish weekly holidays for the next 20 years & reduce our daily sleeping time to 6 hours.

I am more than confident that by the dint of sheer hard work, sincerity & honesty which is imbibed in the bones of Pakistani work force, we can rebuild our country into the comity of 20 developed nations of the world, in the next 15-20 years.

For the benefit of the general public, It will not be out of place to reproduce below my proposal to all the politicians submitted on 13 August, 2010 under the title ” An Excellent Opportunity for the Politicians ”

An Excellent Opportunity for the Politicians by Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad on Friday, August 13, 2010 at 5:54pm.

“Had Pakistan built some large dams in the wasted 10 years of Musharraf era, today the impact of floods would have been on a much reduced scale. These floods are an eye opener for those myopic politicians, who can’t see beyond their nose.

Today (13 August, 2010), Pakistan is economically standing, even behind the stage of 14th August 1947, where foreign exchange reserves are USD 15 billions against loans of about USD 60 billions.

We always crib that dictators had no vision & they did nothing for the long term benefit of Pakistan. Now we must turn this crisis into an opportunity, by planning for at least 100 years ahead.

The Prime Minister must immediately activate the parliament along with all the out of parliament forces, to jointly sit and agree on a 100 years growth and development vision for Pakistan. This vision should be divided into 20 five years plans on which all the politicians should agree.

This planning will give a clear direction to the nation and also save the time and energy of the incumbent and ensuing political governments in useless debates of which dam or project is in the national interest, or against it.

It must also be remembered that changing environmental conditions, are going to be the biggest challenge in very near future, for countries like Pakistan. And let there be no mistake that areas spared by floods this time may always be safe. The future environmental calamities may even be on a much larger scale, engulfing more than one nation. What recently happened in LEH (IOK), should be an eye opener for the entire SAARC countries.

So any future planning, must also be in coordination with and take care of the interests of the neighbouring nations, because no single country has the capacity to survive the adversities of the nature, alone.”

Greatness of a general doesn’t lie in waging and winning a war. Rather, in avoiding the war.

Indian Army chief opposes PM’s trip to Pak ( http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-chief-opposes-PMs-trip-to-Pak/articleshow/16482507.cms?#write )
The full news item titled “Indian Army Chief opposes PM’s trip to Pak”, published by the Times of India on 21 September, 2012 is also reproduced at the bottom of this write up dated 21, September, 2012.

Here, I remember what Winston Churchill said about the generals, “war is too serious a business to be left to the generals”. Adding to that I will say “peace is even more serious a business to be left to the nincompoop Indian Army’s generals, who by their training are mostly prone to their myopic and tunnel vision.”

I wonder, if the Berlin wall would ever have been removed, if the decision was left to the generals of the Indian Army.

So, Gen. Bikram Singh should also know that it’s not Siachin, but the future of 1.5 billion humanity of sub continent which is at stake. If, the blood has shed on a foolish act in the past, why not take action to stop further shedding of blood, for the noble cause of peace & eradication of ignorance and poverty, in the sub continent.

The thinking of such Indian generals, can delay the emancipation of Indians and Pakistanis, but can never permanently deny the divends of peace to such a large world population, which is no more interested in continued acrimony, between the two neighboring countries.

Now,the peace loving people of both the countries have decided once for ever, that they will no more remain the prisoner of the past.

If any body wants to observe the dividends of peace between the neighbors, just look at Europe, Japan, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.

Please read the Times of India report dated 21 September, 2012 reproduced below:

Army chief opposes PM’s trip to Pak
Indrani Bagchi, TNN | Sep 21, 2012, 01.17AM IST

NEW DELHI: Any hope Pakistan may have nurtured that a visit by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh could open the door for a “deal” on Siachen has been dashed, with Army chief Gen Bikram Singh being as opposed to the idea as all his predecessors before him.

In his maiden interaction with the press, Gen Singh clearly stated the ground rules on a border agreement. And they don’t include any troop withdrawal from the Siachen heights. “There is no change in our view at all. We must continue to hold that area…We have lost lot of lives and shed a lot of blood there. The positions are of strategic importance to us. We have conveyed our concerns to the government,” he said. It will be difficult for the Indian government to accept anything less.

Pakistan is hopeful of Singh’s visit before it goes to the polls. Singh himself is keen to visit Pakistan, and has not shied away from making his interest known. With this in mind, Islamabad has pushed New Delhi hard this year to do a deal on Siachen. Pakistan has even delayed talks on the Sir Creek issue in order to mount pressure on India for a Siachen pact.

Returning from Iran after the NAM summit, the PM hinted that a Sir Creek agreement was “doable” but he was silent on Siachen. There is little chance of Singh going to Pakistan this year. His position is very different from Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who had visited Pakistan twice in his five years despite a Kargil and a Parliament attack as well as a disastrous Agra summit between them.

Primarily, it’s because the nature of terrorism from Pakistan has changed substantially in the past decade. But mostly, it’s because Mumbai changed the discourse in a way that will make it difficult for a summit level visit without Pakistan taking demonstrable steps against terrorism. The political atmosphere in India is fragile enough that a concession to Pakistan would be interpreted as a betrayal. The UPA has already taken several knocks after the Sharm-el-Sheikh joint statement with Pakistan in 2009. In the forthcoming state elections, political managers fear a PM visit to Pakistan could be battered on nationalistic lines.

There is cross-spectrum acceptance on trade concessions and people-to-people contacts with Pakistan. But there is no room for a concession on Siachen because it ties in with India’s larger strategic outlook, particularly regarding the China-Pakistan nexus. India’s occupation of the Siachen heights gives it a unique advantage that it does not want to relinquish.

Officials said India’s position on Siachen had neither hardened nor softened for years. But Pakistani Army chief Gen Ashfaq Kayani had said twice in a month (May) that Pakistan wants the Siachen issue to be solved and India had “toughened” its stand asking for a demarcation, which was seen here as a pressure tactic. Ideally, a Siachen agreement should be part of a broad agreement of the border, but Pakistan is yet to agree to that.

“We have been consistent on the steps necessary before demilitarization of Siachen can be carried out. We won’t give up the advantage we enjoy without a very credible, and verifiable, commitment from their side,” a senior Indian Army officer told TOI recently. Another officer pointed out that India has repeatedly pointed out that any demilitarization should be preceded by delineation of Actual Ground Position Line (AGPL), authentication of the line and military positions on maps to be exchanged between the two countries, an end to wrong projection of AGPL in each other’s maps, drawing up framework for demilitarization and as final step withdrawal of troops from the glacial heights. “They are reluctant to agree to our suggestions,” another senior military official said.

The core of the difference between the two sides is this: India wants Pakistan to authenticate positions on the AGPL before any talk of demilitarization or withdrawal. Pakistan is pushing a four-point plan that includes demilitarization, withdrawal of troops, delineation and authentication. India is unwilling to do this.