Archive for 2013
April 13th, 2013 | 
Author: Loud Thinking April 12, 2013 at 05:05PM
Is the confession of Pervaiz Musharraf enough for his treason trial?
How can now Musharraf be allowed to contest the election, after he has admitted giving permission for the drone strikes albeit, selective ones?
The main point here is that the President, the PM, the parliament and the military leadership have always agreed and said that drones are violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty; and illegal as per international law.
Almost every other day our foreign office spokesman condemns drone attacks on our soil. We should remember, that many retired generals who served under Musharraf, have repeatedly said that they were not consulted on Kargil war; and WOT permissions to America.
Now, after the confession of Musharraf about the drone attack permissions to USA, the statements of those generals have automatically proved true. Particularly, the foreign office and MOD’s briefings to many courts and the parliament that there existed no agreement with USA about giving permission, to attack Pakistan with drones.
Now, isn’t the confession of Musharraf, a fit case for crime against the nation and makes him liable for a trial for treason?
I would request the legal experts to kindly dwell on this important national case, wherein, a ruler by-passing all national establishments and parliament, allowed America, ALONE in his capacity as the ruler, to attack Pakistan.
Loud Thinking April 12, 2013 at 04:58PM
Is the confession of Pervaiz Musharraf enough for his treason trial?
How can now Musharraf be allowed to contest the election, after he has admitted giving permission for the drone strikes albeit, selective ones?
The main point here is that the President, the PM, the parliament and the military leadership have always agreed and said that drones are violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty; and illegal as per international law.
Almost every other day our foreign office spokesman condemns drone attacks on our soil. We should remember, that many retired generals who served under Musharraf, have repeatedly said that they were not consulted on Kargil war; and WOT permissions to America.
Now, after the confession of Musharraf about the drone attack permissions to USA, the statements of those generals have automatically proved true. Particularly, the foreign office and MOD’s briefings to many courts and the parliament that there existed no agreement with USA about giving permission, to attack Pakistan with drones.
Now, isn’t the confession of Musharraf, a fit case for crime against the nation and makes him liable for a trial for treason? I would request the legal experts to give their legal opinion please.
Loud Thinking April 12, 2013 at 01:17PM
Act with Care When Someone Cries at Work
It’s natural to feel helpless or uncomfortable when someone cries in front of you in the office. But remember that tears are a normal human reaction, not a sign of weakness. If someone you work with starts to well up, here’s how to handle it:
Acknowledge the tears. Don’t ignore them. Use the occasion to analyze and assess what’s going on, not judge the crier.
Offer a tissue. This gives the person a chance to breathe and gather thoughts. It also communicates that you’re paying attention.
Recognize a problem. Crying means something needs to be addressed: The person is overworked, stressed, sick, or frustrated. This is an opportunity to identify the underlying issue and move forward with clarity.
Today’s Management Tip was adapted from “How to Handle Tears at Work” by Anne Kreamer.
