Loud Thinking

In the aftermath of the intense and consequential Four-Day War of May 25, a distorted narrative has emerged from Indian quarters, claiming that the conflict pitted India not just against Pakistan, but against the shadowy hand of Chinese military support. This portrayal is more than just misleading—it is a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception and conceal uncomfortable truths. The reality is far more sobering: Pakistan stood its ground itself, fighting with indigenous systems and limited resources, against the resources of five technologically advanced powers that provided India with direct operational support.

The assertion of Chinese involvement is an exercise in strategic distraction. By invoking China as the invisible aggressor, India aims to rationalize to its domestic audience how a country many times smaller—Pakistan—could have held its own so effectively. The Indian public, fed for years on the rhetoric of regional dominance, finds it difficult to reconcile the notion of military defeat from Pakistan. To maintain the illusion of superiority, New Delhi has found it convenient to insert Beijing into the equation—not because of any substantiated battlefield role by China, but because blaming a global power is more palatable than acknowledging Pakistan’s outright victory through its resilience and capability.

Here, it will not be out of place to mention the relevant portion of General Sahir Shamshad Mirza’s interview to BBC published by the Express Tribune on June 03, 2025 as below:

“Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, told BBC that Pakistan fought the recent 96-hour conflict with India using only its own resources.

His remarks counter reports from Indian media claiming China’s military assistance to Pakistan during the clash between the two nuclear-armed neighbours last month.

General Mirza emphasised that Pakistan used equipment comparable to India’s and procured some military hardware from other countries.”

It is important to set the record straight. There was no confirmed deployment of Chinese troops, no battlefield engagement by the PLA. This rhetorical smokescreen serves to obscure the fact that it was Pakistan—relying primarily on its own domestically produced JF-17 Thunder fighter jets, Fateh-I and Fateh-II MLRS which in itself was the outcome of Pakistan’s efforts to shift the reliance of its armed forces from foreign arms to domestic weaponry. The Ministry of Defense Production had revealed a project initiated between 2015-2016 which it said was aimed to develop an “extended range MLRS” with teams from Global Industrial Defense Solutions leading the R&D program, homegrown operational doctrines, and national resolve—that stood in defense of its sovereignty.

What remains largely unspoken in mainstream discourse is the sheer scale of foreign military backing India enjoyed during the conflict. Far from being isolated or self-reliant, India drew strength from the direct and indirect support of five major powers—the United States, Israel, Russia, France, and Sweden—each contributing critical assets that tilted the balance of capability in India’s favor.

The United States played a pivotal role through the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA), supplying real-time geospatial intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance data that significantly enhanced India’s situational awareness. This high-end support gave India a strategic advantage in anticipating and intercepting Pakistani movements.

Israel contributed through a combination of drone/UAV’s surveillance and attack, electronic warfare systems, and AI-enabled battlefield software. Reports also suggest the involvement of Israeli-trained personnel embedded within Indian operational units, amplifying the precision and effectiveness of India’s strikes.

The India-Israel military nexus, long in the making, appeared to reach a new peak during this conflict. Many observers noted that Israel may have viewed this as an opportunity to express gratitude to India for its political and logistical alignment during the Gaza conflict that erupted after October 7. Indian media and international reports carried images of armed Indian volunteers and individuals operating in Israeli combat zones—some reportedly involved in acts of violence against unarmed Palestinian civilians, including children. These images sparked global outrage and raised serious legal and ethical questions, particularly in the context of growing allegations of genocide and war crimes. India’s visible partnership with Israel during that period may well have influenced Tel Aviv’s enthusiastic support for New Delhi in the South Asian theatre.

Russia’s contribution was evident in the deployment of advanced platforms like the S-400 air defense system, Su-30MKI fighters, and MiG-29 aircraft, nuclear submarine and aircraft carrier. These assets extended India’s air denial and other military capabilities and added weight to its offensive power.

France provided its latest-generation Rafale jets, armed with Meteor air-to-air and SCALP cruise missiles, alongside the older but upgraded Mirage 2000s. These aircraft formed a core component of India’s deep-strike and air dominance strategy during the conflict.

To this list must be added Sweden, the fifth supporting power. While not directly engaged in operations, Sweden’s long-standing provision of Bofors artillery systems gave India critical firepower that played a significant role in the ground campaign.

In stark contrast, Pakistan fought without a support network. Its capabilities were based on self-reliance—JF-17 and few J-10C fighters, strategic restraint, and a united defense command structure. Despite overwhelming odds, Pakistan held firm, illustrating not just operational resilience but moral clarity in the face of aggressive coalition tactics.

This shifting dynamic makes it clear: India today is not just a regional actor, but a hub of a larger, increasingly militarized axis. For Pakistan, this evolution requires recalibrated defense policies, more robust diplomatic outreach, and a firm commitment to narrative clarity.

Most urgent is the task of correcting falsehoods. Letting the Indian version dominate the international discourse is not merely a reputational issue—it distorts the geopolitical reality. Pakistan must actively tell its side of the story: that it stood alone, unassisted, and unflinching, against a multinational bloc intent on overwhelming it. Truth, after all, is not just a strategic asset—it is a shield against erasure.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Lahore.

+92 321 9402157

3^rd June 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

His Excellency Mr. Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif

Prime Minister of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Islamabad

Your Excellency,

With deep sorrow and a strong sense of resolve, I write to draw your urgent attention to the horrific terrorist attack that took place on May 21, 2025, in Khuzdar, Baluchistan. A school bus full of innocent children was deliberately targeted with an improvised explosive device, resulting in the martyrdom of at least five civilians, including three children, and leaving many others injured.

This deliberate targeting of children, a universally condemned war crime, bears the unmistakable fingerprints of Indian state-sponsored terrorism. According to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), this atrocity is part of a broader campaign by Indian proxies and intelligence assets aimed at destabilizing Pakistan and spreading terror among its most vulnerable—its civilians and schoolchildren.

This is not an allegation in isolation. It is a pattern now acknowledged internationally.

The Government of Canada, through Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, has publicly accused Indian intelligence services of orchestrating the extrajudicial killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil.

The United States Department of Justice has filed criminal charges against Indian nationals in a confirmed plot to assassinate an American citizen in New York.

Most damning of all, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and senior BJP officials have openly admitted to covert cross-border actions and targeted killings, with clear implications that such operations have extended into Pakistan—over 20 such assassinations have been reportedly carried out with state sanction.

In stark contrast, Pakistan has demonstrated maturity, responsibility, and transparency. Islamabad extended an open offer to New Delhi for a neutral international inquiry into the Pahalgam incident, in which several Indian soldiers were killed under suspicious circumstances. India’s outright rejection of this offer, despite global concerns, stands as further evidence of its unwillingness to face independent scrutiny

Your Excellency, in light of this grave and deliberate attack on innocent children in Khuzdar, I most respectfully urge you to:

Immediately call upon the United Nations Security Council to authorize the formation of a neutral, high-level investigative commission comprising experts from the five permanent members (P5) — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The objectives of this commission must be:

1. To thoroughly investigate the Khuzdar school bus bombing;

2. To gather and verify credible evidence of perpetrators and their state affiliations;

3. To fix international accountability on those responsible;

4. To recommend preventive diplomatic and legal actions to uphold global peace and civilian protection.

Such a strategic diplomatic initiative will:

Elevate Pakistan’s image as a responsible, transparent, and peace-seeking state on the world stage;

Pin down India’s global propaganda campaign, which has relied on deflection, misinformation, and unsubstantiated accusations against Pakistan;

Expose the moral and legal bankruptcy of India’s foreign policy, which employs covert terrorism as a tool of statecraft;

And most importantly, win global sympathy and support for Pakistan’s stance against terrorism—particularly when innocent children are targeted in acts of unspeakable brutality.

This is a moment to turn tragedy into a catalyst for justice and global accountability. With your bold leadership, Pakistan can push back against the tide of disinformation, build new alliances, and strengthen its international credibility as a nation committed to peace and the protection of human life.

With deepest respects and in solidarity with the martyrs and their grieving families,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Lahore.

+92 321 9402157

21st May 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

His Excellency,

Mr. Shahbaz Sharif

Prime Minister

Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Islamabad

Respected Prime Minister,

It is respectfully submitted that, in light of the intensified and baseless propaganda campaign led by the Indian state machinery to malign Pakistan as a so-called “terror-exporting” nation, it is imperative that our diplomatic representatives are deployed with strategic clarity, deep historical grounding, and an informed narrative rooted in truth and international law.

Recent history has proven that persistent, fact-based diplomatic outreach, even by a single committed individual, can result in tangible outcomes at the highest levels of global governance. A case in point is the following milestone: “Diplomacy at Full Throttle—Forget Kissinger, This Is Next Level”

In my unwavering commitment to national service, I effectively advocated, within a brief 34-day timeframe, for the exclusion of references to “Pakistan” from joint statements between India and prominent international partners, including Japan, the United States, the UK, EU, Germany, Denmark, France, and five Nordic countries.

Link:- Major diplomatic breakthroughs Henry Kissinger would have proudly endorsed..! | Loud Thinking

Diplomatic Precedent of USA: The April–May 2022 Reversal in U.S. Quad Language

By the Mercy of Allah (SWT), and through the direct communication of undeniable historical facts and reasoned argumentation in an open letter to the U.S. President    ( https://www.snayyar.com/an-open-letter-to-the-president-of-the-united-states.html ), the negative reference to Pakistan and its naming and shaming in the April 11, 2022 Indo-U.S. joint statement was successfully omitted from the Quad Joint Leaders’ Statement on May 24, 2022—. [White House Archive Link] (https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing- a notable policy shift within just 42 days

This experience offers concrete evidence that Pakistan’s position can prevail on international platforms, if presented with clarity, evidence, and confidence.

Recommendations for Pakistani Delegates Engaging with Foreign Governments

1. Thorough Preparation on Key Narratives:

   Understand and be able to articulate the Kashmir issue under UN Resolutions.

   Highlight India’s disinformation campaigns, including EU DisinfoLab revelations.

   Present Pakistan’s sacrifices in the global fight against terrorism with verifiable statistics.

2. Use Precedent to Demonstrate Impactful Diplomacy:

   Reference the April–May 2022 Quad statement shift to show that global positions can change when Pakistan speaks with unity, conviction and truth.

3. Leverage Historical Alliances & Shared Interests:

      Reaffirm Pakistan’s strategic importance in South Asia, its counter-terrorism efforts, and its role in regional stability.

4. Advocate for Respectful Bilateralism:

   Challenge India’s attempts to internationalize blame while refusing dialogue.

   Promote bilateralism based on mutual respect, regional peace, and international law.

5. Request Formal Rectifications Where Needed:

   If defamatory language is used in official foreign communications, urge delegates to demand clarifications or formal corrections, as was done with the 2022 Quad language.

6. Engage with Media and Think Tanks Abroad:

   Encourage our missions to organize briefings, publish op-eds, and engage thought leaders to counteract prevailing narratives.

Conclusion:

Diplomacy is not a zero-sum game. Through persistent, well-researched, and truth-based advocacy, even the most entrenched positions can be reshaped. Pakistan’s cause is just, and its delegates must be trained, equipped, and inspired to speak not only on behalf of the state—but for peace, justice, and truth.

It is hoped that the honorable Prime Minister will consider institutionalizing such successful diplomatic approaches, turning personal achievements into replicable state strategies for effective foreign engagement.

With the utmost respect,

Submitted in national interest,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Lahore.

+92 321 9402157

20^th May 2025nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

His Excellency Mr. Shehbaz Sharif

Prime Minister of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Islamabad

Excellency,

Alhamdulillah, we humbly bow before Allah (SWT) in gratitude for His infinite mercy and for bestowing upon our nation a historic and comprehensive triumph through Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos (آپریشن بُنۡیَانٌ مَّرۡصُوۡصٌ). By the grace of Allah, Pakistan has emerged victorious against a force more than ten times its size, marking a decisive and transformative moment in regional military dynamics.

This monumental achievement has not only reaffirmed Pakistan’s strategic resilience but has elevated its standing to that of the second after China most formidable military power across the region—from the shores of New Zealand to beyond the boundaries of Israel. In light of this unprecedented shift in the balance of power, it is both timely and appropriate to propose the renaming of the “Indian Ocean” to the “Pakistani Ocean,” reflecting this new geopolitical reality.

Your visionary leadership, Excellency, deserves commendation for soon dispatching a delegation of respected and knowledgeable Pakistani representatives to highlight India’s hegemonic ambitions and its consistent violations of human rights. Their mission is critical in unveiling the truth behind India’s destabilizing actions, which jeopardize not only regional but global peace.

To effectively counter Indian propaganda—particularly its baseless claims of Pakistani-sponsored terrorism in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (IIOJ\&K)—it is imperative that our delegation is thoroughly briefed. They must emphasize to the international community that these allegations are strategic diversions aimed at maligning the indigenous Kashmiri freedom struggle, which is firmly rooted in international law, including:

United Nations Charter, Article 1(2), which upholds the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples;

UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, titled Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples; and

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970, which affirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples under colonial and foreign domination through any means at their disposal, including armed resistance.

These legal instruments categorically legitimize the Kashmiri people’s struggle for their right to self-determination and expose India’s military occupation as a violation of international law.

It is India’s own state machinery, not Pakistan, that stands accused of heinous crimes in Kashmir: false-flag operations, systematic genocide, arson, environmental destruction, sexual violence as a weapon of war, the blinding of innocents through banned pellet guns, and countless other atrocities. These constitute the real face of terrorism and must be presented with clarity, courage, and credible evidence.

To support this national narrative with well-documented facts, I respectfully draw your attention to my research archive available at [www.snayyar.com] (http://www.snayyar.com). The site comprehensively documents Indian war crimes and should serve as a vital resource for our diplomatic efforts.

With profound respect and in service to Pakistan,

Sincerely,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Lahore

Contact: +92 321 9402157

18^th May 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

Excellency Shahbaz Sharif

Prime Minister of Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Islamabad

Excellency,

With hearts brimming with pride and immeasurable gratitude, the people of Pakistan salute the unparalleled valor and strategic brilliance of our Armed Forces, who have gifted the nation a priceless and historic triumph – a clear and decisive military victory over India, etched forever in history on 10th May 2025 under your brave and prudent leadership.

This monumental achievement — in which the might of the many times larger adversary was shattered within the first wave of Pakistan’s defensive-offensive maneuvers — forced India to urgently sue for a ceasefire. The swiftness, precision, and dominance displayed by our forces not only safeguarded our sovereignty but restored global respect for Pakistan’s military capability. It is not just a victory of arms, but of national dignity, unity, and resilience.

In recognition of this unprecedented service, the nation humbly proposes the following measures as a formal gesture of appreciation and institutional recognition:

1. Doubling of Salaries for All Armed Forces Personnel

Effective 1st January 2025, the basic salaries and service benefits of all serving personnel of the Army, Navy, and Air Force should be doubled,which will still be lower than the recent enhancement approved for parliamentarians, ministers, and advisors. This will not only acknowledge their critical role but also reflect parity in national reward mechanisms.

2. Tax Exemption on Military Salaries

To honor the sacrifices and service of the Armed Forces, it is proposed that all military and para-military salaries be made 100% tax-free, effective 1st January 2025, to enhance their take-home income and morale.

3. Doubling of Martyr (Shuhada) Compensation Packages

The compensation packages for families of all martyrs — both civilian and military — should be doubled, effective 1st January 2025, to honor their ultimate sacrifice for the nation and ensure the financial dignity of their surviving dependents.

4. Funding Through a Landmark Foreign Exchange Deposit Scheme

To fund the above initiatives and simultaneously propel Pakistan toward economic strength, it is proposed that the government launch a Special Foreign Exchange Bank Deposit Initiative (no questions asked on source) with the following key features:

Up to 7% biannual tax-free return on US Dollar/other approved foreign currencies deposits in Pakistani banks deposits, as per details below:

Open to resident and expatriate Pakistanis, and foreign nationals worldwide.

Deposit tenure options with incremental profit rates: 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

Full government guarantee on principal and return.

This highly attractive scheme is anticipated to fetch over $500 billion in foreign exchange deposits in a short timeframe — unlocking the path toward rapid economic emancipation and future defense and space research needs.

In addition to military benefits, the sudden generation of foreign exchange reserves will also empower the government to deliver historic civilian tax relief:

Effective 1st July 2025, income tax rates on all civilian salaried persons should be reduced to half of current levels.

From the next financial year (2025-2026), a flat 10% tax rate should be applied to all salaried income.

Moreover, to promote gender equity and economic participation, income earned by all female salaried professionals should be made completely tax-free effective 1^st July 2026.

Conclusion

This proposal is not just a policy recommendation, but the heartfelt voice of a grateful nation. Let us rise collectively to honor those who defend our borders and protect our peace. It is time for Pakistan to reward its heroes not with words alone — but with lasting financial dignity and national recognition.

Let this moment mark the beginning of a new era: one of military pride, civilian relief, and national prosperity.

Pakistan Zindabad. Armed Forces Paindabad.

Respectfully submitted,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Lahore.

+92 321 9402157

12^th May 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

His Excellency António Guterres
Secretary-General
United Nations Headquarters
New York, NY 10017, USA

Subject: Formal Urgent Request for UN Action Against India’s Longstanding Violations of International Law, Extraterritorial Terrorism, and Systemic Human Rights Abuses (1971–2025)

Date: 7 May 2025

Excellency,

We respectfully submit this letter as a comprehensive charge sheet against the Republic of India for its persistent, state-sanctioned violations of international law and basic human rights spanning over five decades. These violations include cross-border terrorism, religious genocide, extrajudicial killings, false flag operations, subversion of sovereign nations, and denial of the right to self-determination under the United Nations Charter and relevant Security Council resolutions.

---

I. Timeline of State-Sponsored Acts and International Law Violations

1. 1971 – Orchestrated Ganga Hijacking and Indian Military Intervention in East Pakistan

• The hijacking of ‘Indian Airlines’ “Ganga” plane took place on January 30, 1971 was blamed on Kashmiri separatists.
• Declassified records and testimonies suggest India staged it to justify banning Pakistani overflights—crippling West Pakistan’s supply lines.
• Later admitted by former RAW officers and acknowledged in Indian media.

     2. 1971 – Role in Dismemberment of Pakistan

• RAW’s involvement in arming Mukti Bahini is well-documented.
• Indian leadership publicly acknowledged aiding the insurgency that led to Bangladesh’s secession.
• Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi publicly admitted in 2021:
  “We made a commitment to divide Pakistan, and we did it.”
• This constitutes a gross breach of the UN Charter’s Article 2(4) prohibiting force against another sovereign state.

2. 1984 – Unilateral Seizure of Siachen Glacier (Operation Meghdoot)

• India’s aggressive posture in Siachen remains a destabilizing factor, with the region still witnessing military deployments and skirmishes at extreme altitudes. This provocation exemplifies a broader pattern of expansionist behavior that threatens regional peace and violates both the letter and spirit of bilateral and international commitments.

• India preemptively occupied the Siachen region in direct violation of the Simla Agreement and without provocation.
• The move militarized one of the world’s most ecologically fragile zones and continues to provoke conflict and climate degradation.

---

II. Indian Support to Insurgency in Pakistan and Confession of Captured Agent

3. 2016 – Arrest of Indian Navy Officer Kulbhushan Jadhav in Baluchistan

• Indian spy Commander Kalbhushan Jadhav (alias Hussain Mubarak Patel) was arrested inside Baluchistan.
• In his video-confession (shared with the International Court of Justice and UN bodies), Jadhav admitted:

“I am a serving officer of the Indian Navy. I was directed by RAW to destabilize Pakistan, particularly targeting CPEC.”

• India took the matter to the ICJ but notably did not challenge the substance of his confession or Pakistan’s sovereign right to prosecute.
• This confession confirms India’s use of armed proxies, funding, and terrorism in Baluchistan—clearly violating Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and multiple anti-terror conventions.

4. Open Statements by Indian Political and Military Leaders

• Indian leadership, including former National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and Prime Minister Modi, have publicly threatened destabilization of Pakistan:
  • Ajit Doval (2014): “We will engage Baloch insurgents. The cost to Pakistan should be raised.”
  • Narendra Modi (2016): “I want to talk to the people of Baluchistan.”
• These statements amount to open admission of interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state, violating international law.

5. Targeted Killings of Chinese Nationals Working on CPEC

• Multiple terror attacks on Chinese citizens, particularly in Baluchistan, KPK and Karachi are closely aligned with India’s declared opposition to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
• The pattern strongly suggests that Indian intelligence is leveraging local proxies to sabotage economic development and regional cooperation.

---

III. Systemic Persecution and Genocide of Muslims in India

6. 2002 – Gujarat Pogroms

• Over 2,000 Muslims were brutally killed under the leadership of then-Chief Minister Narendra Modi.
• Modi was denied entry into the U.S. under the International Religious Freedom Act due to “severe violations of religious freedom.”

7. 2019–Present – Abrogation of Article 370 and 35-A and Repression in Kashmir

• India unilaterally revoked Kashmir’s special status and imposed severe restrictions including:
  • Internet shutdowns
  • Mass detentions of children, journalists, and politicians
  • Torture and demographic changes in violation of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

8. Denial of Right to Self-Determination

• UN Security Council Resolutions (38, 47, 91, 96, 98, 122, 123, 126) call for a UN-supervised plebiscite in Jammu & Kashmir.
• India has persistently denied this right, unlawfully branding the indigenous Kashmiri freedom movement as “terrorism,” despite their lawful struggle for self-determination protected under international law, including Common Article 1 of the ICCPR and ICESCR.

---

IV. Cross-Border Terrorism and Extraterritorial Assassinations (2022–2025)

9. Targeted Assassinations Abroad

• Confirmed killings and plots involving Indian intelligence:
  • Zahoor Mistry – Karachi (2022)
  • Hardeep Singh Nijjar – Canada (2023)
  • Paramjit Singh Panjwar – Lahore (2023)
  • Foiled assassination attempts on U.S. citizen Gurpatwant Singh Pannun by RAW agent Nikhil Gupta (2023)

10. Modi’s Public Endorsement of Assassinations

• PM Modi publicly declared in 2024:

“Aaj Bharat ghar mein ghus ke marta hai”
(India now kills enemies inside their homes.)

This statement is a self-incriminating confession of India’s adoption of a policy of extrajudicial, extraterritorial killings, in direct violation of the UN Charter and sovereignty of foreign nations.

---

V. False Flag Operations: Historical Pattern of Manipulated Terror

• 2000 – Chattisinghpora Massacre (38 Sikhs killed, later exposed as staged by Indian forces)
• 2006 – Malegaon Blasts (Muslims blamed; Hindu extremists, including Indian military officer, later convicted)
• 2007 – Samjhauta Express Bombing (68 Pakistanis killed; Indian agencies implicated)
• 2008 – Mumbai Attacks (investigations obscured the death of ATS Chief Hemant Karkare who was probing Hindu terror networks)
• 2019 – Pulwama Attack and Balakot Airstrikes
• Suicide attack on CRPF soldiers led to escalatory strikes by India.
• Indian media and political leadership used the incident to stir nationalist sentiment just before elections. Independent analysis questioned the timing and veracity of India’s claims. Even then governor of IIOJ&K Satya Pal Malik revealed that the Pulwama terror attack was exploited for political gains and that prime minister Narendra Modi had instructed him to remain silent and National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval also advised him to refrain from speaking about it. He maintained that the CRPF had requested aircraft to transport troops, but the demand was refused by the Home Ministry. The car carrying 300 kilograms RDX explosives remained undetected while travelling around in IIOJ&K for 10-15 days.

2025 – Pahalgam Killings and Government Denial of Neutral Inquiry

• Civilians were killed in alleged “crossfire,” a claim denied by their families.
• India’s refusal to allow a neutral or international inquiry raises serious doubts—particularly in light of historical false flag events like the 2000 Sikh massacre.
• The pattern suggests a deliberate effort to malign Pakistan in an area 400 kilometers away from the line of control and before elections, as repeatedly done through fabricated or manipulated incidents.

---

VI. Legal Summary of Violations

India’s actions constitute breaches of:

• UN Charter Articles 2(4), 1(2)
• Geneva Conventions (especially IV, Article 49)
• Genocide Convention (1948)
• Rome Statute of the ICC (Articles 7, 8, and 15)
• ICCPR and ICESCR – Right to life, liberty, and self-determination

---

VII. Recommendations and Prayer for Relief

In light of the above, we urge the United Nations and its competent bodies to:

1. Convene an international tribunal or UN-mandated commission to investigate India’s acts of terrorism, assassinations, and religious persecution.
2. Refer India to the ICC for crimes against humanity and state-sponsored terrorism.
3. Enforce UN Security Council resolutions guaranteeing the right to plebiscite in Kashmir.
4. Designate Hindutva organizations as terrorist networks.
5. Impose sanctions and asset freezes on individuals complicit in these crimes.
6. Appoint a Special Rapporteur for religious persecution and political repression in India.
7. Protect the integrity of sovereign states by addressing India’s cross-border terror and interference in Baluchistan and CPEC.

---

Conclusion

The evidence now before the international community is overwhelming and spans over five decades of repeated, state-sanctioned abuse. India has used its global partnerships and media influence to deflect criticism while continuing an aggressive campaign of military occupation, religious genocide, foreign interference, and targeted killings.

We urge the United Nations to fulfill its duty to uphold peace, justice, and human dignity by holding the Republic of India accountable under international law.

Respectfully,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
Lahore.
+92 321 9402157
7^th May 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

His Excellency António Guterres 

Secretary-General 

United Nations Headquarters 

New York, NY 10017 

United States

Subject: Urgent Appeal to Uphold UN Charter and Resolutions Concerning the Right of Self-Determination of the People of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (IIOJ&K)

Your Excellency,

I write to you with profound urgency and grave concern regarding the ongoing and intensifying campaign of systemic human rights violations, collective punishment, and political subjugation perpetrated by the Government of India in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (IIOJ&K).

The continued denial of the right of self-determination to the Kashmiri people constitutes a blatant violation of international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, relevant Security Council resolutions, and General Assembly declarations.

The right of all peoples to self-determination is enshrined in Article 1(2) of the UN Charter, which states that one of the purposes of the United Nations is “to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.” This foundational right is further affirmed in General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, which proclaims: “All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

More pointedly, General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) of 1970 on the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States emphasizes that the use of force to deny peoples their right to self-determination is itself a violation of international law and legitimizes resistance: “Every State has the duty to refrain from any forcible action which deprives peoples… of their right to self-determination and freedom and independence.”

Further, General Assembly Resolution 2649 (XXV) of 1970 “Affirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples under colonial and alien domination recognized as being entitled to the right of self-determination to restore to themselves that right by any means at their disposal.”

The Kashmiri people, whose territory is recognized by the United Nations itself as disputed, are engaged in a legitimate and lawful struggle against Indian military occupation. The United Nations Security Council has passed multiple resolutions, including Resolutions 47 (1948), 91 (1951), and 122 (1957), which explicitly call for a plebiscite to be held under UN auspices to determine the wishes of the Kashmiri people. The presence of UNMOGIP (United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan) further affirms this disputed status.

Despite these international obligations, India continues to falsely label the Kashmiri people’s legitimate resistance as “terrorism”, a deliberate distortion of lawful political struggle as recognized under international law. This narrative is not only dishonest but dangerously misleading, serving as a pretext for heinous war crimes including extrajudicial killings, arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, mass surveillance, demographic engineering, and systematic demolition of civilian homes.

Such actions meet the threshold of crimes against humanity, as defined in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Article 7), and India must be held accountable. If these atrocities continue unabated, and if the UN continues to allow the systematic perversion of its own laws and resolutions, then the world must ask: what value do these principles hold if they are not enforced?

We therefore urge the United Nations and your esteemed office to:

1. Publicly reaffirm the right of the people of Jammu & Kashmir to self-determination under international law; 

2. Demand an immediate cessation of India’s state-sponsored campaign of repression and human rights violations in IIOJ&K; 

3. Strongly warn the Government of India to cease its mischaracterization of Kashmiri resistance as terrorism; 

4. Initiate proceedings and investigations through the International Criminal Court (ICC) and International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding India’s potential war crimes in the occupied region. These investigations must comprehensively take into account the United Nations’ own reports, including the OHCHR Reports on the Situation of Human Rights in Kashmir (2018 & 2019), as well as findings from reputable international human rights organizations such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and others. In addition, verified investigative journalism and global media documentation of mass graves, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and other evidence of genocide and crimes against humanity must form part of the evidentiary record considered by these proceedings; 

5. Ensure the implementation of relevant UNSC resolutions through concrete diplomatic and legal mechanisms.

The credibility of the United Nations depends on its commitment to uphold justice, equality, and human rights. The people of Kashmir cannot wait any longer, nor should they be expected to surrender their inalienable rights in the face of occupation and oppression.

We trust in your conscience and courage to act in accordance with the noble principles upon which the United Nations was founded.

Respectfully,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
Lahore.
+92 321 9402157
1^st May 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

Dear Brothers and Sisters of India,

In the spirit of shared humanity and a common destiny, we reach out not as adversaries, but as neighbors, deeply concerned for the future of our peoples and the generations yet to come.

The prospect of a full-scale nuclear war between India and Pakistan is not merely a military issue—it is an existential threat, looming writ large. Such a catastrophe would not remain confined to the subcontinent. Its radioactive clouds would sweep across Asia, Europe, Africa, and beyond. Crops would fail. Skies would darken. Economies would collapse. The climate would plunge into chaos. And the survivors—if any—would be condemned to a life of agony, disease, hunger, and hopelessness, far worse than death itself.

We must never allow this to happen. There is no victory in nuclear war—only mutual and total annihilation.

We appeal to you, the people of India, to raise your voices—not in anger, but in wisdom. Urge your leaders to embrace sanity, diplomacy, and dialogue over destruction. Let them see that nationalism must never be stronger than humanity.

Both our nations must understand that we have to live in peace—or die together in war. There is no middle ground when nuclear weapons are involved. We owe it to our children and their children not to leave behind a legacy of radioactive wastelands and shattered civilizations.

Let us not become the authors of a history that will only be remembered as the beginning of the end. Let us instead become co-authors of a future that celebrates cooperation, shared prosperity, and peace.

Our true enemies are not each other—they are poverty, disease, illiteracy, and hatred. These are the battles worth fighting, and they can only be won together.

It is time we turn our shared border from a fault line of fear into a bridge of friendship. With joint patrolling, mutual respect, and open dialogue, we can ensure security while building trust.

India and Pakistan have no option but peace. We must resolve all differences through dialogue, not destruction. We must ensure our legacy is not one of nuclear horror, but of peace and progress.

We, the people of Pakistan and India, must now urge the leadership of both countries to immediately meet at a neutral location under the auspices of UN Secretary General António Guterres to begin a new era of peace. Let us work together toward a vision where both nations live like the borderless nations of Europe—sharing air, water, and hope instead of hostility. In the face of worsening climate change, which already threatens our rivers, fields, and skies, we cannot afford to turn on each other. We must unite to protect what we both call home.

I take this opportunity to call upon the shining leaders of civil societies in both India and Pakistan—namely Karan Thapar, Barkha Dutt, Pravin Sawhney, Suhasini Haider, Arundhati Roy, Shabana Azmi, Amitabh Bachchan, Sunil Gavaskar, Colin Gonsalves, Ram Jethmalani, Indra Jaising, Mushahid Hussain, Najam Aziz Sethi, Farzana Bari, Ali Ahmad Kurd, Imaan Mazari, Mushaal Hussain Malik, Dr. Sania Nishtar, Huzaima Bukhari, Arfa Sayeda Zehra, Nasim Zehra and Javed Jabbar—to take up this challenge of a peace initiative for the sake of the teeming billions of this planet Earth. Just imagine: if Kailash Satyarthi and Malala Yousafzai could win the Nobel Peace Prize together, why can’t these respected voices of reason join hands for an even greater Nobel cause—ensuring the survival and peace of two nations, and perhaps the world.

With hope, urgency, and unwavering solidarity, 

A Voice for Peace from Across the Border

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
Lahore.
+92 321 9402157
30 April 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.com The writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

His Excellency António Guterres
Secretary-General
United Nations
New York, NY 10017
United States

Subject: URGENT APPEAL FOR UNITED NATIONS ACTION TO HALT THE ONGOING GENOCIDE
AND HUMANITARIAN CATASTROPHE IN INDIAN ILLEGALY OCCUPIED JAMMU & KASHMIR
(IIOJ&K)

Excellency,

I write this letter as a desperate, yet unwavering appeal to the conscience of the international community through your esteemed office to urgently take up, without any further delay or equivocation, the unfolding human tragedy and grave violations of international law in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (IIOJ&K). The continued inaction in the face of overwhelming evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity risks eroding the very foundation upon which the United Nations stands.

Since 1947-48, the people of IIOJ&K have faced systematic persecution by the Indian State a repression which has escalated into what can only be termed as a slow-motion genocide. Over 900,000 Indian troops have militarized the region, turning it into the most densely occupied territory on Earth. More than two million Kashmiris have lost their lives or suffered brutal injuries, while countless others including women, children, and the elderly have been maimed, raped, blinded by banned pellet guns, or buried in mass graves.

India’s narrative of “counterterrorism” must no longer be accepted as a false shield for its systematic and premeditated state-sponsored terrorism against the indigenous Kashmiri population. Multiple UN Security Council resolutions have explicitly recognized the lawful right of the Kashmiri people to self-determination a right protected under international law and never to be criminalized or misrepresented. Yet, India has maliciously twisted global counterterrorism rhetoric to delegitimize this legitimate resistance and equate it with terrorism a deliberate distortion which itself constitutes a gross abuse of international norms and obligations. 

We call upon the United Nations to strictly debar India from invoking the pretext of terrorism to justify atrocities, collective punishments, and demographic engineering in IIOJ&K. Instead, this sustained campaign of violence and repression must be rightly labeled as state-sponsored terrorism carried out by Indian authorities to suppress a people’s legally mandated struggle.

These atrocities, extensively documented by UN Human Rights bodies and credible international media, include: 

– The deliberate and indiscriminate demolition of civilian homes (media reported on 28^th April 2025 that four so-called terrorists had carried out so-called terror attacks at Pahalgam, but Indian security forces have blown up houses of 10 Kashmiris in the IIOJ&K) and orchards, economic strangulation of Kashmiri businesses, and arbitrary imprisonment of political and student leaders. 

– Proven false flag operations used as pretexts for collective punishment, including massacres, house burnings, and mass arrests. 

– The broadcast of torture victims’ cries over loudspeakers acts so vile they violate the very essence of humanity. 

– Genocidal policies of starvation and siege, particularly during extended curfews, aimed at exterminating infants, the ill, and the elderly.

India has not only violated Article 1 of the UN Charter, but also its own international commitments, including numerous UN Security Council resolutions that reaffirm the Kashmiris’ right to self-determination a right now criminalized under the guise of counter-terrorism. This deliberate misuse of global anti-terrorism narratives has enabled impunity for India’s crimes, while silencing a people seeking the very justice and dignity the UN exists to protect.

Excellency, we hereby implore you to take immediate action by: 

1. Urgently referring the matter to the UN Security Council for deliberation and resolution under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. 

2. Requesting advisory proceedings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding the legality of India’s actions post-August 5, 2019, including its attempt to alter the demographic character of the disputed territory. 

3. Initiating proceedings at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity committed in IIOJ&K. 

4. Immediately appointing a UN Special Representative on Kashmir to investigate and report on the current human rights and humanitarian situation. 

5. Dispatching a UN fact-finding mission to IIOJ&K to assess the ground realities and propose mechanisms for accountability and reparations. 

6. Calling for international sanctions against India until it ceases its atrocities, and demanding worldwide seizure of properties and assets of those responsible including posthumous confiscation to compensate the victims’ families. 

7. Reaffirming in the strongest possible terms the inalienable right to self-determination for the people of Jammu & Kashmir, as enshrined in UN Security Council resolutions.

Excellency, this is not simply a matter of failed diplomacy this is a war on the soul of humanity. Every day that passes without UN intervention is another day soaked in the blood of innocent children, mothers, students, and elders. If the United Nations cannot stop genocide in a land where its own resolutions call for justice, then history will not judge India alone it will judge the silence of the world.

The eyes of a tormented nation look toward you. Do not let the cries from the mountains of IIOJ&K echo unheard in the halls of this world’s highest moral authority. Act now, or risk being remembered not as guardians of peace but as witnesses to a century’s greatest betrayal.

Yours faithfully,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad

Lahore.

+92 321 9402157

29 April 2025

nayyarahmad51@gmail.comThe writer is a senior corporate leader and strategic analyst. His thought-provoking visionary insights have reshaped global discourse, capturing the attention of world leaders. His writings have not only resonated with heads of state and governments but have also influenced the foreign policies of the United States and other major powers.

Subject: Request to Reschedule Start of PSL Match from 3 PM on May 1st to Midnight Timing Due to Extreme Heat

Syed Mohsin Naqvi
The Chairman,
Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB),
PSL Management,
Lahore, Pakistan.

Dear Sir,

I am writing to respectfully request that the Pakistan Super League (PSL) match between MS & KK teams scheduled for May 1st, 2025, at Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore, currently planned for a 3:00 PM start, be rescheduled to a later time — preferably starting at 11.30 PM.

Given the severe heatwave affecting Lahore and surrounding areas, with under the shade temperatures expected to exceed 40°C during the afternoon, I am genuinely concerned about the health and safety of the players, spectators and staff for the game starting under direct sunlight temperature which must be above 50 degree centigrade at 3 PM. Playing under such extreme conditions will definitely lead to heat exhaustion, dehydration, and other serious health risks.

I believe that shifting the match to a late-night start time would significantly reduce these risks, create a more comfortable environment for everyone involved, and maintain the high standards of competition that the PSL is known for.

I humbly appeal to the PCB and PSL management to kindly consider this suggestion in light of the exceptional weather conditions. Prioritizing the health and well-being of all participants would be greatly appreciated by cricket lovers like myself.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
+92 321 9402157