The #Privatisation #Dilemma: A Closer Look at #PIA’s #Path to #Recovery

Introduction

Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), once a symbol of national pride and a leading carrier in South Asia, has faced turbulent times in recent years. Mounting financial losses, operational inefficiencies, and a tarnished reputation have led many to question whether privatisation is the only viable option to salvage PIA. In this article, we will explore the complexities of privatisation and consider alternative strategies that could potentially help revive the airline.

The PIA Conundrum

PIA’s decline can be attributed to a multitude of factors, including mismanagement, political interference, an ageing fleet, and competition from regional and international carriers. The airline has suffered continuous financial losses, with a debt burden that has become unsustainable. In such a dire situation, privatisation often emerges as a tempting solution to rescue state-owned entities.

The Privatisation Argument

Proponents of privatisation argue that transferring PIA into private hands could lead to several benefits. Firstly, it can inject much-needed capital into the airline, enabling it to modernize its fleet, improve infrastructure, and enhance operational efficiency. Private investors are more likely to make strategic decisions based on market forces rather than political considerations. Secondly, privatisation can bring in experienced professionals who can steer the company towards profitability. Finally, competition in the private sector can drive innovation and customer-focused improvements, potentially making PIA more competitive on the global stage.

The Counterarguments

While privatisation has its merits, there are valid counterarguments that need to be considered. Firstly, the government must ensure that the privatisation process is transparent and fair to avoid potential corruption and favouritism. Secondly, privatising PIA could result in layoffs and labour unrest, which can have negative social implications. Additionally, there’s no guarantee that a private entity would prioritize serving remote or unprofitable routes, potentially leaving underserved regions in Pakistan isolated. Lastly, there is the risk that the airline’s new owners might prioritize profit over safety and customer service, which could further erode PIA’s already damaged reputation.

Alternative Strategies

Privatisation should not be viewed as the sole option to rescue PIA. Several alternative strategies can be considered to rehabilitate the airline without losing state control:

1. Restructuring and Professional Management: PIA can undergo a comprehensive restructuring with the help of professional management. This includes cost-cutting measures, streamlining operations, and eliminating political interference. The appointment of an airline industry experienced CEO with a clear mandate for reform is crucial.
2. Strategic Partnerships: The government can explore strategic partnerships with well-established airlines. Such collaborations can include code-sharing agreements, joint ventures, or investment partnerships. These alliances can bring in expertise and financial support without ceding full control.
3. Debt Restructuring: Negotiating debt restructuring with creditors can alleviate some of PIA’s financial burdens. This approach, coupled with stringent financial discipline, can help the airline get back on its feet.
4. Fleet Modernization: Prioritizing the modernization of PIA’s ageing fleet is essential. Newer, fuel-efficient aircraft can reduce operational costs and improve customer satisfaction.
5. Enhanced Oversight: The government can establish robust oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency, accountability, and fair competition within the aviation industry.

Conclusion

The question of whether privatisation is the only option to salvage PIA is a complex one. While it offers potential benefits, it also carries significant risks and challenges. It is essential to explore alternative strategies that can help revitalize the airline while retaining state control. Restructuring, strategic partnerships, debt restructuring, fleet modernization, and enhanced oversight can all contribute to PIA’s recovery without resorting to privatisation. Ultimately, the path chosen should prioritize the long-term viability of PIA and the interests of its passengers and employees.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

Why the Pakistani Cricket Team Needs a New Captain…!

Babar Azam, undeniably one of the world’s finest batsmen, finds himself in a situation necessitating his replacement as Pakistan’s captain for the 2023 ICC ODI World Cup.

Firstly, Babar’s batting form has faltered in recent months. Over his last 10 ODIs, he’s managed a mere average of 31.50, well below his career average of 47.62, with his highest score being only 74.

Secondly, Babar’s captaincy has come under heavy criticism from numerous experts. He’s been faulted for his defensive approach, erroneous player selection, flawed field placements, questionable bowler choices, and subpar pitch reading skills. Furthermore, he’s overseen the loss of many winnable matches, and his communication skills are in dire need of improvement.

Thirdly, Babar is laboring under a substantial workload. Currently captaining Pakistan across all three formats while also being a leading batsman has undoubtedly taken a toll on his form.

Replacing Babar Azam as captain would offer him the opportunity to focus on his batting, while allowing the team to benefit from a more exuberant and tactically astute captain.

In this context, appointing Shaheen Shah Afridi as captain with Muhammad Rizwan as vice-captain would inject fresh energy into the team. Afridi is a proven strong leader and a stellar role model for younger players, while Rizwan, as a world-class player and one of the best wicketkeeper-batsmen in the game, would provide invaluable guidance.

Last but certainly not least, the Pakistani team will require stellar batting performances from Babar throughout the World Cup campaign, something that might be unattainable if he’s burdened with the strenuous responsibilities of captaincy during the demanding tour of India.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

Cricket Crisis – How to Revitalize Pakistani Cricket Team

Cricket Crisis – How to Revitalize Pakistani Cricket Team

The Pakistani cricket team’s performance in the upcoming ODI Cricket World Cup 23, scheduled to take place in India next month, holds immense significance. Not only does it carry the weight of the Pakistani nation’s hopes, but it also symbolizes a source of inspiration for approximately 500 million Muslims residing in India, IIOJ&K, and Bangladesh The team’s success can uplift spirits far beyond borders.

In view of the foregoing, the recent disappointing performance of our cricket team in the Asia Cup has highlighted the need for a significant transformation within the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). It’s evident that the current leadership is professionally and mentally unable to modernize the organization. In fact, if things continue this way, the PCB might suffer a fate similar to the PHF, which has altogether destroyed the fabric of hockey in Pakistan.

Given the urgency, here are some immediate changes that the Caretaker Prime Minister (as the chief patron of the PCB) should consider before the ODI World Cup:

1. Appoint Shaheen Shah Afridi as the captain of both the T20 and ODI teams.
2. Include Saim Ayub and Imad Wasim in the World Cup Squad.
3. Replace Inzamam ul Haq with Iqbal Qasim as the Chief Selector.
4. Replace Misbah ul Haq and consider Javed Miandad or Mohsin H. Khan as the Chairman of the Cricket Committee.
5. Replace Micky Arthur with Aamir Sohail or Mohsin Hasan Khan as the head coach.

These changes are essential to revitalize our cricket team’s performance and bring fresh leadership to the PCB.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

Leveraging Advanced Technologies to Combat Smuggling: A Path Forward for Pakistan

Smuggling has long been a thorn in Pakistan’s side, posing a significant threat to its economy and security. The illicit trade of goods, drugs, and weapons not only drains valuable resources from the nation but also undermines its rule of law and stability. In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, Pakistan has a golden opportunity to combat this menace effectively.

The Problem at Hand
Smuggling in Pakistan is a complex issue with multifaceted challenges. The porous borders, corruption, and an extensive network of criminal organizations have allowed this illegal trade to thrive. Smugglers exploit weaknesses in the system, costing the Pakistani economy billions of dollars in lost revenue annually. The time has come for Pakistan to adopt innovative solutions and embrace the latest technologies to tackle this issue head-on.

Utilizing Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
One of the most promising approaches to combat smuggling is through the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies. These technologies can analyze vast amounts of data, helping authorities detect patterns and anomalies indicative of smuggling activities. For instance, AI can monitor trade data, flagging irregularities in imports and exports that may signify smuggling.

Pakistan should also invest in advanced surveillance systems equipped with AI-powered image recognition to monitor border areas. Drones and satellites can play a pivotal role in this regard, providing real-time monitoring of vulnerable regions where smuggling is rampant. These technologies can help authorities identify suspicious movements and respond swiftly.

Blockchain for Transparency
Implementing blockchain technology can bring a much-needed level of transparency to Pakistan’s trade processes. By recording every step of a product’s journey, from production to distribution, on an immutable blockchain ledger, the government can verify the authenticity of goods, making it harder for counterfeit products to enter the market. Additionally, blockchain can enhance the traceability of goods, reducing the scope for smuggling.

Smart Border Control
Modernizing border control is essential. The integration of biometric systems, such as facial recognition and fingerprint scanners, can streamline the entry and exit of people and goods at border crossings. Moreover, the use of smart sensors can detect hidden compartments in vehicles, thereby making it harder for smugglers to transport contraband.

Collaboration and Information Sharing
To effectively combat smuggling, Pakistan should establish better cooperation and information sharing mechanisms with neighboring countries and international organizations. Smuggling often transcends borders, and a coordinated effort is crucial. The exchange of intelligence and best practices can lead to more effective enforcement.

Public Awareness and Education
Creating public awareness campaigns can also play a vital role. Pakistan should educate its citizens about the negative consequences of smuggling, both in terms of economic impact and national security. Engaging the public can lead to more active reporting of suspicious activities and discourage individuals from participating in smuggling operations.

Investment in Human Resources
Technology alone cannot solve the smuggling problem. Pakistan must invest in training and equipping its law enforcement agencies with the necessary skills and tools to combat this menace effectively. Skilled personnel are essential for the successful implementation of advanced technologies.

In Conclusion
The menace of smuggling is a significant challenge for Pakistan, but it is not insurmountable. By embracing the latest technologies, such as AI, ML, blockchain, and advanced surveillance systems, Pakistan can significantly enhance its ability to detect and deter smuggling activities. However, technology should be complemented by effective collaboration, public awareness, and a well-trained workforce to achieve lasting success in the fight against smuggling. This is not only an economic imperative but also a crucial step towards securing Pakistan’s future and fostering a thriving, lawful, and prosperous nation.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

#Out of #Box #Solutions for the #SIFC..!

The Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) is a new initiative by the government of Pakistan to attract foreign investment and boost economic growth. The council has the potential to be a major game-changer for the Pakistani economy, but it needs to be implemented effectively.

In this connection, some out-of-the-box improvements are submitted below that could be made to the SIFC to help Pakistan grow fast economically:

• Make the SIFC more transparent and accountable. The council should be required to publish regular reports on its activities and performance. This would help to build trust with investors and ensure that the council is being used effectively.
• Give the SIFC more power to cut through red tape. The council should be given the authority to fast-track investment projects and waive unnecessary regulations. This would make it easier for investors to do business in Pakistan.
• Expand the SIFC’s mandate to include other sectors. The council is currently focused on attracting foreign investment in the energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing sectors. It should be expanded to include other sectors, such as agriculture, tourism, and IT.
• Work with international organizations. The SIFC should partner with international organizations, such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, to get their expertise and support. This would help the council to be more effective in attracting foreign investment.
• Promote Pakistan’s investment opportunities abroad. The SIFC should set up offices in key foreign markets to promote Pakistan’s investment opportunities. This would help to attract foreign investors to Pakistan.

These are just a few of the out-of-the-box improvements that could be made to the SIFC to help Pakistan grow fast economically. By making these changes, the council could become a powerful tool for attracting foreign investment and boosting economic growth.

In addition to the above, the following are some other things that the government of Pakistan can do to improve the business climate and attract foreign investment:

• Reduce the cost of doing business. This can be done by streamlining the regulatory process, reducing taxes, and improving infrastructure.
• Protect property rights. This will give investors confidence that their investments will be safe.
• Fight corruption. Corruption is a major obstacle to investment. The government needs to take steps to root out corruption in order to attract foreign investment.
• Improve the education system. A skilled workforce is essential for attracting foreign investment. The government needs to invest in education to improve the skills of its workforce.
• Promote tourism. Tourism is a major source of foreign exchange. The government needs to promote tourism to attract more foreign visitors.

By taking these steps, the government of Pakistan can create a more attractive investment climate and attract the foreign investment that it needs to grow its economy.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

An Urgent Humanitarian Appeal to the US President..!

Urgent Appeal for Addressing Human Rights Concerns in India

The Honorable Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.
President of the United States of America

Esteemed Sir,

Greetings,
We wish you all the success during your ensuing visit to India from 7-9 September 23 to attend the G-20 Summit and hope that your hosts will not exploit your presence as a license to commit genocide of Muslims in India (as was done in Delhi riots when Donald Trump visited India on 24 – 25 February 2020. The 2020 Delhi riots, were multiple waves of bloodshed, property destruction, and rioting in North East Delhi, beginning on 23 February 2020 and caused chiefly by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims. Of the 53 people killed, two-thirds were Muslims who were shot, slashed with repeated blows, or set on fire. More than a week after the violence had ended, (hundreds) of wounded were languishing in inadequately staffed medical facilities and corpses were being found in open drains. By mid-March 2020 many Muslims had remained missing.
Now it is becoming a recognizable pattern that whenever an American President announces his visit to India, a physical and social genocide of minorities (read Muslims) is unleashed in India. Few weeks before your start of the September 7 – 9 visit to India Hindus and BJP government in Haryana province unleashed an unimaginable genocide and atrocities against Muslims by burning alive Muslims, mosques, properties and bull dozing of residences and business shops etc. These inhuman acts were widely reported by the international media, and a few reports are provided below:

1. Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) provides the most authentic genocide proofs as below:
   https://www.csw.org.uk/2023/08/11/press/6054/article.htm
2. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2023/8/12/muslims-in-haryana-face-calls-for-economic-boycott-after-violence-in-nuh
3. https://www.reuters.com/world/india/least-five-killed-hindu-muslim-clashes-indias-haryana-state-2023-08-01/
4. https://time.com/6303571/how-bulldozers-became-a-symbol-of-anti-muslim-sentiment-in-india/
5. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scroll.in/latest/1053652/haryana-violence-updates-several-shanties-set-ablaze-in-gurugram-more-than-70-arrested

No one can forget the old Indian practice and the established pattern of sucking blood of its minorities for terrorizing them on the eve of visits of the US President, when (as reported by the NY Times) the murder of 35 Sikh villagers in a place called Chittisinghpora.
This massacre, occurred on the evening of 20 March 2000, preceded Clinton’s arrival by only a few hours. It was a monstrous way to transmit a message, whatever that message was, and the scale of the killing was large even amid the exceptional sorrows of the Kashmir Valley. The slaughter was also remarkable in that the victims were Sikhs, a religious minority never before targeted during a bloody decade infused with grief. In the aftermath, the valley’s 60,000 Sikhs faced the possibility that they were now someone’s strategic quarry and that a mass migration might be a sensible reaction to the danger.
https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/31/magazine/a-kashmiri-mystery.html
However, as the whole world knows and we hope that the Indians also know very well that this US President named Joe Biden is a different man, who will never mince his words and actions when there was a question of Human Rights.
Here we remember your quote just a year ago of 15 July 2022 as below:
‘For an American President to be silent on an issue of human rights, is this consistent with — inconsistent with who we are and who I am? I’ll always stand up for our values.’
However, in this regard, provided below are few world level important statements (in the US Congress and at the EU) after their findings and extensive research; need your immediate attention and subsequent actionable statement, in line with your above quote, truly reflecting your policy, tradition and values.
a). Genocide Watch
Jan 28, 2022
Dr. Stanton Notes Early Warning Signs of Genocide in India
Gregory Stanton, President of Genocide Watch
Interviewed by Karan Thapar for The Wire, India.
One week after briefing the US Congress, where he warned Congress that “genocide could very well happen in India”, the Founding President of Genocide Watch has said he’s asking “the US Congress to pass a resolution that warns that genocide should not be allowed to occur in India”. Dr. Gregory Stanton also said: “(President) Biden should tell (Prime Minister) Modi that if genocide occurs in India, it will require the US to reassess all our relations with India.”

In a 28-minute interview with Karan Thapar for The Wire, Dr. Stanton said that although his organization, Genocide Watch, does not rank countries, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum believes that, India is the second most likely country for a genocide to happen in the coming year.
In the interview with The Wire, Dr. Stanton said, “the early warning signs of (genocide) are present in India.” Referring to Genocide Watch’s ’10 stages of genocide’, he said several of the stages have been fulfilled in India. The ones he identified are classification (distinguishing between people as ‘us vs. them’ and ‘othering’ them), symbolization (identifying people by the clothes they wear or calling them abba jaan), discrimination (the Citizenship Amendment Act), dehumanization (calling them termites and foreigners who should go to back to Bangladesh) and polarization (accusing them of ‘love jihad’ and discriminatory laws against conversion and inter-marriage).
On top of all this, he said that at Hardiwar on December 17, there were actually calls for genocide, which he added, were crimes of incitement to genocide under the Genocide Convention, to which India is a signatory.
Dr. Stanton said, “Just because a country is a democracy it’s not impossible for a genocide to happen.” He cited America’s own example where, he said, genocide was carried out against Native Americans and against African Americans during the slave trade.
Dr. Stanton said whilst it’s not his view that genocide is happening in India at the moment, his fear is that the stages that lead to genocide, what he calls the early warning signs, have occurred. “Genocide is not an event. It’s a process. It develops,” he said.
Dr. Stanton said if genocide happens, “it won’t be committed by the state, but by mobs organized by RSS and BJP militants who will lead it.”
Speaking specifically about Prime Minister Modi, Dr. Stanton said he has told the US Congress that he believes the Prime Minister encouraged the 2002 Gujarat massacres of over 1000 Muslims. Modi has also used anti-muslim rhetoric to build his political base. “He has a record, (and) he has to answer”, he said. “He needs to be accountable.”
Speaking about the Prime Minister’s silence – a month has passed since the Dharam Sansad and the Prime Minister has not spoken a word – Dr. Stanton said: “He is the Prime Minister of India. He is the leader of the country. He has a moral obligation to denounce hate speech.” He added, “leaders have a responsibility to not remain silent.”
Asked by The Wire how he interprets Mr. Modi’s silence, Dr. Stanton quoted Martin Luther King, Jr., who said, “We will know who is against us not by what they say, but by their silence.”
Asked by The Wire if he was saying Mr. Modi’s silence damns him, Dr. Stanton replied: “It sure does”.
In 1989, five years before genocide happened in Rwanda, Dr. Stanton forewarned the president of the country that maintaining ethnicity on identity cards would become a tool for genocide. He told President Habyarimana that if he didn’t prevent it, Rwanda would have genocide within five years. Five years later that is precisely what happened.
https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/dr-stanton-notes-early-warning-signs-of-genocide-in-india
b) https://tribune.com.pk/story/2433215/top-eu-officials-commit-to-addressing-rights-violations-in-kashmir
As you know Sir, the charter of the UN specifically allows the subjugated population to wage struggle for the Right of Self Determination, but India has cunningly projected Kashmiris of the IIOJ&K’s struggle for their Right of Self Determination against the Indian occupational forces, as terrorism, to mislead the West, which was the easiest way to distract the champions of Human Rights, like you Sir. Here, the below given proof of unequivocal statement (link provided below) in the Indian parliament by the son of the Maharaja of Kashmir is no doubt that Kashmir was never integral or non-integral part of India and that Kashmiris are justly struggling for their legal right of self determination as per the charter of the UN and the UNSC resolutions on Kashmir. So, the Indian manipulation of branding their struggle as a terrorism, is it self a violation of the UN charter and makes India culpable for trying under the war crimes tribunal.
Speech at the Indian parliament by the son of Maharaja of Kashmir:
https://www.facebook.com/syed.n.ahmad.92/videos/10210076406167911/?sfnsn=scwspwa&mibextid=Gbt8ca

In this regard, kindly peruse at the link given below the best ever and most authentic and voluminous chronically compiled details, about the genocide and Human Rights violations worse than committed by the Germany of Adolf Hitler, which includes killings, rampant rapes used as a weapon of war, abductions, torture (which was broadcast over loud speakers to terrorize the population of the area), scorch earth policy by destroying the fruit gardens and causing mass scale blindness to the Kashmiri kids, youth and the entire population at an scale never ever witnessed in the HUMAN HISTORY.
https://www.snayyar.com/india-is-a-fit-case-to-be-expelled-from-the-g-20.html#sthash.QZrxpW2g.dpbs
Moreover, the latest revelations made by Satya Pal Malik former governor of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (Link provided below) proved how, besides the bogey of terrorism to suppress the Kashmiris, the Indian government of BJP/Modi killed its own 40+ soldiers to create a narrative of false flag operation, to find an excuse to launch military attack over Pakistan, just for petty objective of getting popular votes (in general elections 2019) of its Hindu population. In this regard, who else better than you know the facts that this Indian misadventure brought India and Pakistan (both nuclear power) how much close to an all-out full-fledged war.
https://youtu.be/LYUbBAlGq-I

https://thewire.in/government/watch-karan-thapar-satya-pal-malik-narendra-modi

hhttps://tribune.com.pk/story/2412250/pulwama-attack-revelations-vindicate-pakistan-fottps://thewire.in/government/watch-karan-thapar-satya-pal-malik-narendra-modi

Sir, it is hoped that after going through the complete compilation of the war crimes of India provided at the links given above, you as the biggest champion of the Human Rights will take up with the Indian leadership this grave matter (which is a fit case of war crimes trial) of Holocaust type genocide of Muslims in India and Kashmir.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has already ruled that the principles underlying the Convention represent a PREEMPTORY norm against genocide that no government can derogate.
The Genocide Convention authorizes the MANDATORY jurisdiction of the ICJ to adjudicate disputes, leading to international litigation such as the Rohingya genocide case, dispute over the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and recently in March 2020 Senior judges at the international criminal court have authorized an investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan, overturning an earlier rejection of the inquiry. The ICC investigation will look at actions by US, Afghan and Taliban troops. It is possible, however, that allegations relating to UK troops could emerge in that process.
https://amp.theguardian.com/law/2020/mar/05/senior-icc-judges-authorise-afghanistan-war-crimes-inquiry
Now, the question arises that If US, U.K. and Russian troops can be investigated under the genocide conventions for much lesser crimes, why not the Indian government and its functionaries be investigated for much worse genocide and serious war crimes which are very well documented in the
book titled ‘Gujarat Files: Anatomy of a Cover Up’ which is a journalistic book about the 2002 Gujarat riots authored and self-published by Rana Ayyub, which can be down loaded free of cost at:

https://www.pdfdrive.com/gujarat-files-anatomy-of-a-cover-up-e196474650.html
and tons of other documentary proofs of International and Indian organizations and personalities as detailed above in the link titled India is a fit case to be expelled from the G-20 ?

Now when India wants permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council it must immediately comply with the UN GA Resolution 45/130 (which stipulates Right of peoples to self-determination/Struggle by all means https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-184801/ and India’s commitment with the world at large at the UNSC, as well.

Moreover, India must also pay war crimes reparations to the Kashmiris and Muslims living in India and face the inquiries of the international criminal court.

In conclusion, we implore you to leverage your position and influence to initiate dialogue with Indian leadership concerning these pressing concerns. The evidence presented and the voices that have spoken out underscore the gravity of the situation. Your unwavering commitment to justice and human rights serves as a beacon of hope in a world marked by challenges.

With the deepest respect,

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
+92 321 9402157
Lahore
Pakistan.
3 September 2023

Support and Debt Relief for Pakistan not a Favour but Duty of the Free World..!

Introduction:
Pakistan’s vital contribution as a front-line state in the War on Terror (WOT) has come at a hugely cost.

The country’s resilience has been tested not only by terrorism but also by the impact of climate-induced disasters. This article presents a comprehensive case for Pakistan to seek international support, including debt relief and grants, considering its role in global security and the compounded losses caused by climate-related disasters.

Background:

The past two decades have marked Pakistan’s dedication to global security as a WOT ally.

However, alongside this commitment, the nation has faced the adverse effects of climate change. The country’s vulnerability to climate-induced disasters was demonstrated through a series of devastating floods, further compounding its economic and social challenges.

Terrorism and Climate Disasters: A Dual Challenge:

1. Humanitarian Toll:

The dual challenges of terrorism and climate-induced disasters have taken an enormous toll on Pakistan’s citizens. Lives lost, injuries sustained, and displacement caused by both factors have left indelible scars on communities across the nation.

2. Economic Devastation:

The economic impact of terrorism was worsened by the recurring floods caused by climate change. The floods, exacerbated by global warming, resulted in severe economic losses of approximately $100 billion. This further strained Pakistan’s resources and resilience.

3. Displacement and Disruption:

The floods displaced over 35 million people, stretching social services and infrastructure to their limits. The government had to divert resources from countering terrorism to addressing the immediate needs of flood-affected populations.

The Combined Case for Debt Relief and Grants:

1. Acknowledging Dual Challenges:

Recognizing the dual challenges of terrorism and climate-induced disasters, the international community should consider providing debt relief and grants to Pakistan as a means of recognizing its unique circumstances.

2. Climate Responsibility:

Western nations, as key contributors to global greenhouse gas emissions, share a responsibility for the climate-induced disasters that have disproportionately impacted Pakistan.

Providing assistance is a moral and ethical obligation.

3. Sustainable Recovery:

Debt relief and grants would enable Pakistan to allocate resources toward both countering terrorism and rebuilding after climate disasters, promoting long-term stability and growth.

4. Preventing Cycles of Debt:

By alleviating Pakistan’s debt burden, the international community can help prevent a cycle of borrowing to address crises, allowing the country to invest in resilience-building measures.

5. Global Partnerships:

Collaborative efforts between Pakistan, international organizations, and Western nations can lead to effective solutions that address both security concerns and climate vulnerabilities.

Diplomatic Engagement and Documentation:

1. Multilateral Advocacy:

Pakistan should engage in multilateral dialogues within the United Nations framework to present its case for support.

Highlighting the dual challenges of terrorism and climate change will enhance understanding.

2. Scientific Evidence:

Alongside detailing its contributions and losses, Pakistan should present scientific evidence of climate change’s role in exacerbating floods, emphasizing the global nature of this challenge.

3. Shared Goals:

By aligning its plea with global goals such as the Paris Agreement and sustainable development targets, Pakistan can emphasize the interconnectedness of security, climate, and development.

Conclusion:

Pakistan’s sacrifices and contributions as a front-line state in the War on Terror are undeniable.

Additionally, the country’s resilience in the face of climate-induced disasters further underscores its need for international support. Debt relief and grants would not only acknowledge Pakistan’s role but also recognize the compounded losses due to both terrorism and climate change. By fostering international collaboration and shared responsibility, the global community can pave the way for Pakistan’s recovery, stability, and long-term growth while addressing the multifaceted challenges of our times.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

Fostering Comprehensive Progress in Pakistan: Decentralization, Presidential Democracy, and Prior Reforms

Fostering Comprehensive Progress in Pakistan: Decentralization, Presidential Democracy, and Prior Reforms

Introduction:

In the quest for accelerated progress and development, Pakistan is confronted with the pivotal question of whether a combination of more provinces, robust local governance systems, and a shift to a presidential form of democracy could pave the way for a brighter future. This article embarks on an in-depth exploration of these proposed changes while considering their potential synergies with prior reforms in the judiciary, taxation, services, education, social welfare, and health sectors.

I. Strengthening Local Governments:

At the heart of any nation’s development lies the strength of its local governance systems. By decentralizing power, Pakistan can address issues at the grassroots level more effectively. With the introduction of elected local bodies, the country has taken initial steps towards devolution. This approach can bolster the efficient delivery of public services, increase citizen engagement, and offer tailored solutions to local challenges.

Moreover, it can serve as a crucial tool to combat corruption, as accountability becomes more accessible and transparent when decisions are made closer to the people.

II. The Case for Additional Provinces:

The existing provincial divisions in Pakistan can sometimes impede efficient governance due to the country’s immense geographic, cultural, and linguistic diversity. The proposal to establish more provinces holds promise in mitigating these challenges by facilitating localized decision-making, resource allocation, and cultural representation. However, this proposition necessitates careful deliberation on resource distribution, historical sensitivities, and maintaining a balance between centralized and decentralized power.

III. Presidential Form of Democracy:

Transitioning from a parliamentary to a presidential form of democracy could bring about a significant shift in the dynamics of governance. The presidential system, if implemented thoughtfully, may contribute to stability by reducing the frequency of leadership changes. It has the potential to establish clear lines of accountability and streamline decision-making processes. However, the success of this change hinges on implementing robust checks and balances to prevent the potential misuse of power, ensuring that the system remains responsive to the needs of the people.

Prior Reforms and Their Implications:

1. Judicial Reforms:

Efforts to revamp the judiciary have aimed to expedite the legal process, improve access to justice, and enhance the rule of law. A restructured legal framework would be crucial in ensuring the effectiveness of decentralization and a presidential system.

2. Taxation Reforms:

Overhauling the taxation system can lead to increased revenue collection and a more equitable distribution of resources. This is vital for sustaining new provinces and local governments.

3. Service Sector Reforms:

Reforming public services can enhance efficiency and transparency. Empowering local governments can further ensure that services are tailored to specific needs and effectively delivered.

4. Education and Health Sector Reforms:

Prioritizing education and healthcare improvements can elevate human capital, vital for sustained progress. Effective decentralization and governance changes can lead to better resource allocation and service delivery in these sectors.

5. Social Welfare Reforms:

Strengthening social welfare programs can mitigate disparities and improve the standard of living. Local governance can play a pivotal role in tailoring programs to the unique needs of each region.

Conclusion:

As Pakistan navigates its path towards accelerated progress, the prospects of implementing more provinces, fortified local governance systems, and a presidential democracy are complemented by prior reforms in various sectors. The synergy between these changes and previous improvements in the judiciary, taxation, services, education, social welfare, and health sectors can collectively shape a comprehensive approach to development.

However, the journey forward is intricate and multifaceted. It requires a delicate balance between centralization and decentralization, responsive governance structures, and steadfast commitment to democratic values. Through an inclusive and consultative process, Pakistan can harness the potential of these reforms to forge a more prosperous, equitable, and resilient nation that stands as a beacon of progress in the region.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

Few Suggestions for Improving Standard of Primary Education Despite Low Budget Allocations..!*

Improving the standard of primary education in Pakistan with limited resources and a large population is a challenging task, but there are some strategies that could help:

1. **Prioritize Teacher Training:** Focus on providing quality training for teachers, even with limited budgets. Well-trained teachers can have a significant impact on student learning outcomes.

2. **Utilize Technology:** Leverage low-cost technological solutions such as educational apps, online resources, and digital content to supplement traditional teaching methods and reach more students.

3. **Community Involvement:** Engage parents and communities to create a conducive learning environment. Volunteers can assist in classrooms, and community members can help maintain school facilities.

4. **Curriculum Simplification:** Streamline the curriculum to focus on core competencies and skills. This can reduce the need for extensive resources and make learning more effective.

5. **Collaboration:** Partner with NGOs, international organizations, and private sector to pool resources and expertise for improving education quality.

6. **Optimize Infrastructure:** While resources are limited, ensure that existing infrastructure is utilized efficiently. Repair and maintain school buildings to create a positive learning environment.

7. **Student-Centered Approach:** Tailor teaching methods to accommodate diverse learning styles, ensuring that every child has an opportunity to excel.

8. **Regular Assessment:** Implement regular assessments to monitor student progress and identify areas needing improvement. This allows for targeted interventions.

9. **Flexible Scheduling:** Explore alternative scheduling options, like afternoon or weekend classes, to accommodate students who might be working or contributing to family income.

10. **Advocacy and Awareness:** Raise awareness about the importance of education to encourage parents and communities to prioritize sending children to school.

11. **Public-Private Partnerships:** Collaborate with private organizations to share resources, knowledge, and infrastructure.

12. **Incentives for Teachers:** Introduce performance-based incentives to motivate teachers and improve their job satisfaction.

13. **Peer Learning:** Encourage peer learning and group activities, which can help students support each other’s learning process.

14. **Resource Sharing:** Establish networks where schools can share educational materials, lesson plans, and best practices.

15. **Innovation in Learning:** Promote innovative teaching methods that require minimal resources, such as experiential learning, storytelling, and hands-on activities.

Remember, while a low budget poses challenges, creative and strategic planning can still lead to meaningful improvements in primary education.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.

Few Options for the Revival of Pakistan Steel Mills!

Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) is a state-owned steel mill located in Karachi, Pakistan. It was established in 1953 and was once one of the largest steel mills in South Asia. However, the mill has been struggling financially for many years and has been incurring losses.

There are a number of reasons for PSM’s financial problems. These include:

• Old and outdated equipment: The mill’s equipment is outdated and inefficient, which results in high production costs.
• High energy costs: PSM’s energy costs are high due to the high cost of electricity in Pakistan.
• Low productivity: PSM’s productivity is low due to a number of factors, including outdated equipment, poor management, and labor unrest.
• Political interference: PSM has been subject to political interference, which has made it difficult to implement reforms.

In order to revive PSM, the government of Pakistan needs to take a number of steps. These include:

• Investing in new and modern equipment: The government needs to invest in new and modern equipment to improve PSM’s productivity and efficiency.
• Reducing energy costs: The government needs to take steps to reduce PSM’s energy costs, such as providing the mill with subsidized electricity.
• Improving productivity: The government needs to improve PSM’s productivity by addressing the factors that are currently holding it back, such as outdated equipment and poor management.
• Removing political interference: The government needs to remove political interference from PSM and allow the mill to operate on a commercial basis.

In addition to these measures, the government could also consider privatizing PSM. Privatization would allow the mill to access private capital and expertise, which could help it to become more efficient and profitable.

Here is a more detailed plan for the government of Pakistan:

1. Establish a task force: The government should establish a task force to oversee the revival of PSM within a defined time period. The task force should be composed of experts from the public and private sectors.
2. Prepare a feasibility study: The task force should prepare a feasibility study to assess the viability of reviving PSM. The study should consider the cost of the investment, the potential benefits, and the risks involved.
3. Develop a business plan: Based on the feasibility study, the task force should develop a business plan for PSM. The business plan should outline the steps that need to be taken to revive the mill, such as investing in new equipment, reducing energy costs, and improving productivity.
4. Implement the business plan: The government should implement the business plan for PSM. This will require the allocation of financial resources and the provision of political support.
5. Monitor the progress: The government should monitor the progress of the revival of PSM. This will help to ensure that the mill is on track to achieve its goals.

The revival of PSM would be a major economic boost for Pakistan. It would create jobs, generate revenue, and reduce the country’s reliance on imports. However, it is a complex and challenging undertaking that will require the commitment of the government and the private sector.

Syed Nayyar Uddin Ahmad
03219402157
Lahore.